2018
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2017.1418678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational antibiotic design: in silico structural comparison of the functional cavities of penicillin-binding proteins and ß-lactamases

Abstract: The class of ß-lactam antibiotics has proven highly efficient in targeting bacterial penicillin-binding proteins (PBP) leading to the blocking of the bacterial cell wall synthesis. However, the benefit of these drugs is limited because of bacterial resistance mechanisms; the most widespread resistance involves ß-lactamase enzymes (ßLACT) that inactivate ß-lactam-based molecules. We focused on PBPs and ßLACTs from enterobacteria, and performed a detailed in silico study of PBPs whose inactivation is lethal for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all of our work so far, we have focused on the transformation of existing approved ß-lactam antibiotics. However, many bacteria, including clinically significant Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, have developed resistance to these antibiotics so that novel antibiotic structures are urgently needed to replace them (Blinder et al 2019 ; Fisher et al 2005 ; Helfand and Bonomo 2005 ; Mbaye et al 2019 ; Shimizu et al 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all of our work so far, we have focused on the transformation of existing approved ß-lactam antibiotics. However, many bacteria, including clinically significant Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, have developed resistance to these antibiotics so that novel antibiotic structures are urgently needed to replace them (Blinder et al 2019 ; Fisher et al 2005 ; Helfand and Bonomo 2005 ; Mbaye et al 2019 ; Shimizu et al 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%