2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000121861.63006.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: Comparative Assessment of Maximal Bladder Capacity, 0.9% Nacl Versus 0.2 M Kcl, for the Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis: A Prospective Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study, as designed, contains similar, albeit minor, shortfalls to those we identified previously in a study by Daha et al. [2], i.e. that the C max was not clearly defined by titration against functional bladder capacity (as determined by frequency‐volume diary) and that it is unclear whether the two fluid solutions were infused in addition to the patient’s postvoid residual volume or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study, as designed, contains similar, albeit minor, shortfalls to those we identified previously in a study by Daha et al. [2], i.e. that the C max was not clearly defined by titration against functional bladder capacity (as determined by frequency‐volume diary) and that it is unclear whether the two fluid solutions were infused in addition to the patient’s postvoid residual volume or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%