Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements
DOI: 10.1109/cpem.1990.109978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-defining the kilogram via a moving-coil apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is perhaps a quirk of history that two experiments were already planning to measure electrical power in SI units just as a more fundamental prospect was discovered. Kibble's suggested alteration to ampere balances caused the NPL in England [79] and the NBS in the United States [80] to redesign their existing ampere balances to take advantage of the motion mode. They had yet to complete either system when the QHE was discovered in 1980.…”
Section: A Direct Link To H Via Quantum Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is perhaps a quirk of history that two experiments were already planning to measure electrical power in SI units just as a more fundamental prospect was discovered. Kibble's suggested alteration to ampere balances caused the NPL in England [79] and the NBS in the United States [80] to redesign their existing ampere balances to take advantage of the motion mode. They had yet to complete either system when the QHE was discovered in 1980.…”
Section: A Direct Link To H Via Quantum Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lever arm for motion control was preserved. The magnet was redesigned to incorporate a horizontal circular coil to reduce the field interactions between the coil and magnet in place of the figure 8 induction coil, as related in [122]. The coils and balance apparatus were built into a vacuum chamber.…”
Section: Npl Mark Ii-in Vacuum New Coil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final result of this set-up with a relative standard uncertainty of 2×10 −7 was published in 1990 [32,42]. An improved apparatus, described in the next sections, was presented during the same year [43,44]. In the mean time, this experiment has reached a short-term reproducibility in the order of one part in 10 8 [45], and a new result for the Planck constant may be expected in the near future.…”
Section: The Existing Projects and Their Main Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contributors to the quoted u , , ~ of 13,6 x 10" for h were (in parts in lo8): induced voltage U in terms of the Josephson effect, 11,2; experimental standard deviation of the mean of 50values of WwJW, 4,8; index of refraction of air, 4,8 (the velocity was measured interferometrically); optical fringe frequency, 2,O; and buoyancy correction for the standard masses, 2,O. Kibble and colleagues have now built a "next generation" apparatus that operates in vacuum and that has been designed to reduce these uncertainties significantly; a u ~, ~ of less than 1 x lo4 is eventually anticipated [38].…”
Section: Watt Balance Nplmentioning
confidence: 99%