Re‐thinking active surveillance for the multiparametric <scp>magnetic resonance imaging</scp> era

Eldred‐Evans, David; Ahmed, Hashim U.

doi:10.1111/bju.14699

BJU International

2019

DOI: 10.1111/bju.14699

|View full text |Cite|

Re‐thinking active surveillance for the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging era

David Eldred‐Evans

Hashim U. Ahmed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the article by Eldred‐Evans , the AUC value in paragraph 3 was incorrect in the original published version; it should have been 0.85. This has been corrected in the online version.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Corrigendum

2019

BJU International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CorrigendumIn the article by Eldred-Evans [1], the AUC value in paragraph 3 was incorrect in the original published version; it should have been 0.85. This has been corrected in the online version.The correct paragraph reads as follows:The results are encouraging, with upgrading occurring in only 1.8% of men with a prior negative MRI. With follow-up, progression to radical treatment was 12.8%, which is consistent with the established diagnostic performance of mpMRI. The authors seek further improvements by investigating if PSA dynamics can identify men with a negative MRI at risk of progression. They find that PSA velocity is strongly associated with subsequent progression (AUC 0.85, P < 0.001) and conclude that men on AS with low-risk disease can safely avoid biopsy in favour of MRI, PSA monitoring and selective re-biopsy. Reference1 Eldred-Evans D, Ahmed HU. Re-thinking active surveillance for the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging era.

show abstract

“…In the article by Eldred‐Evans , the AUC value in paragraph 3 was incorrect in the original published version; it should have been 0.85. This has been corrected in the online version.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Corrigendum

2019

BJU International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Re‐thinking active surveillance for the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging era

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Corrigendum

Corrigendum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About