Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aims to review the literature regarding the barriers to sampling, recruitment, participation, and retention of members of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in health research and strategies for increasing the amount of health research conducted with socially disadvantaged groups.MethodsA systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. Searches of electronic databases Medline, PsychInfo, EMBASE, Social Science Index via Web of Knowledge and CINHAL were conducted for English language articles published up to May 2013. Qualitative and quantitative studies as well as literature reviews were included. Articles were included if they reported attempts to increase disadvantaged group participation in research, or the barriers to research with disadvantaged groups. Groups of interest were those described as socially, culturally or financially disadvantaged compared to the majority of society. Eligible articles were categorised according to five phases of research: 1) sampling, 2) recruitment and gaining consent, 3) data collection and measurement, 4) intervention delivery and uptake, and 5) retention and attrition.ResultsIn total, 116 papers from 115 studies met inclusion criteria and 31 previous literature reviews were included. A comprehensive summation of the major barriers to working with various disadvantaged groups is provided, along with proposed strategies for addressing each of the identified types of barriers. Most studies of strategies to address the barriers were of a descriptive nature and only nine studies reported the results of randomised trials.ConclusionsTo tackle the challenges of research with socially disadvantaged groups, and increase their representation in health and medical research, researchers and research institutions need to acknowledge extended timeframes, plan for higher resourcing costs and operate via community partnerships.

Electronic Cigarettes: Awareness, Recent Use, and Attitudes Within a Sample of Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Australian Smokers

“…The main strength of this cross-sectional survey is its large sample of highly disadvantaged smokers with high rates of homelessness, poverty and indigenous status, often referred to as hard-toreach 40 . This was achieved by approaching smokers through a CSO.…”

Setting up a clinical trial for a novel disease: a case study of the Doxycycline for the Treatment of Nodding Syndrome Trial – challenges, enablers and lessons learned

“…identified different categories of socially disadvantaged groups such as women of low-income status for targeted strategies to increase their involvement in health research [26]. One study contested the view that although recruitment of women into clinical trials may present formidable challenges, follow-up rates may not be associated with their low-income or minority status [27].…”

Capturing the carer’s experience: a researcher’s reflections

“…A systematic review undertaken by Bonevski et al (2014) advocated specific strategies that can be incorporated into the study design to improve access to hard to reach populations. In relation to sampling, a convenience or census sample can be obtained through an organisation with high access to the target population.…”

“…In relation to sampling, a convenience or census sample can be obtained through an organisation with high access to the target population. Bonevski et al (2014) acknowledge that this approach has limitations but argue that it presents pragmatic advantage for sampling a hard to reach group. Miller et al (2003) advocates that positive interpersonal relationships between the research participants and the people recruiting into the study are essential in maximising participant recruitment.…”