2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction kinetics and mass transfer studies of biomass char gasification with CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some investigators [24] conducted a series of TG tests by varying the sample mass, gas flow rate, heating rate, particle size, and the height of crucible to minimize the inhibition of external and internal diffusions on the measurement in the TG and to characterize the intrinsic kinetics. Vincent et al [25] and Mani et al [26] believed that kinetics analysis could be considered intrinsic for char gasification of TG tests in the lower temperature range (750-900°C) and with fine particle size (\90 lm) without regard to other experimental parameters, while the case of char combustion might be quite different due to the relative lower activation energy of oxidation reaction. In addition, the role of diffusion was reported as a function of the conversion degree [27] and complementary analysis of the variation of the diffusional effects with conversion is necessary in particular for the kinetics analysis from TG experiments.…”
Section: Influence Of Diffusion Limitation On the Differences Of Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators [24] conducted a series of TG tests by varying the sample mass, gas flow rate, heating rate, particle size, and the height of crucible to minimize the inhibition of external and internal diffusions on the measurement in the TG and to characterize the intrinsic kinetics. Vincent et al [25] and Mani et al [26] believed that kinetics analysis could be considered intrinsic for char gasification of TG tests in the lower temperature range (750-900°C) and with fine particle size (\90 lm) without regard to other experimental parameters, while the case of char combustion might be quite different due to the relative lower activation energy of oxidation reaction. In addition, the role of diffusion was reported as a function of the conversion degree [27] and complementary analysis of the variation of the diffusional effects with conversion is necessary in particular for the kinetics analysis from TG experiments.…”
Section: Influence Of Diffusion Limitation On the Differences Of Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In general, compared with coal or coke, biomass char has the following advantages: (1) higher CO 2 reactivity, (2) lower initial temperature to react with CO 2 , and (3) less ash content. [22][23][24] With these merits of biomass char and the knowledge obtained in processing the ore using gaseous reduction followed by melting separation, 25,26 the biomass char was considered applicable to process the ore for phosphorus removal in a method similar to the FASTMELT process; thus, a novel method was proposed by the present authors. In this method, biomass char is adopted as the reducing agent in direct reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thilakavathi et al (2010) calculated the reaction kinetic parameters of wheat straw char in a CO2 atmosphere using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and found that the char-CO2 reaction activity increased when the temperature rose from 750 °C to 900 °C. Butterman and Castaldi (2007) found that the biomass gasification reaction characteristics changed in a mixture of CO2 and steam prepared according to different proportions, indicating that the addition of a small quantity of CO2 allowed the most significant improvement in the steam gasification reactivity.…”
Section: Fig 1 Biomass Gasification Power Generation and Co2-reuse mentioning
confidence: 99%