1962
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90031-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction mechanism and shell effects from the interaction of 14.6 MeV neutrons with nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 together with TENDL-2017 evaluation except for the two 14-MeV data points of Refs. [160,161] which exceed essentially all other equivalent data. Results of Ref.…”
Section: Momentioning
confidence: 63%
“…48 together with TENDL-2017 evaluation except for the two 14-MeV data points of Refs. [160,161] which exceed essentially all other equivalent data. Results of Ref.…”
Section: Momentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Additionally, after normalization for the gamma-yield per decay of the 1368.626 keV gamma line of 24 Na, the reported data of Ref. [122] changed by 12%. Refrences [92,131] adopted the 63 Cu(n, 2n) 62 Cu reaction as the monitor reaction.…”
Section: Mo Reactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Upon normalization with the IRDFF-II evaluation of the 56 Fe(n, p) 56 Mn reaction, the cross sections changed by 16% and 9%, respectively. Refrences [56,94,[120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130] adopted the 27 Al(n, α) 24 Na reaction as the monitor reaction. After normalization with the IRDFF-II evaluation of the 27 Al(n, α) 24 Na reaction, the cross sections changed by 7% for Refs.…”
Section: Mo Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows that the experimentally measured 97 Mo(n,p) 97 Nb reaction cross section at the effective neutron energy of 14.54 ± 0.24 MeV is in good agreement with the evaluated data of ENDF/B-VIII.0 [19], JEFF-3.3 [20], JENDL-4.0 [21], ROSFOND-2010 [22] and CENDL-3.1 [23] libraries, literature data [25, 27, 29-32, 35-37, 42, 43] as well as with the value from TALYS-1.9 [7].However, A large variation was found among the data of Paul et al [39], Strohalet al [40] and Tikkuet al [41] compared to the experimental data of others [25, 27, 29-32, 35-37, 42, 43] and present work as well as from the theoretically estimated values of TALYS-1.9 and evaluated data of different libraries.…”
Section: Estimation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%