Reaction-sintered LAGP solid electrolytes with MoS2 coating for improved stability with Li metal

Baek, Seung-Jin; Cha, Eunho; Kim, Dong Gyu; Yun, Jong Hyuk; Kim, Do Kyung

doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.072

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…NASICON-type: More methods are applied to minimize interfacial resistance and counteract electrolyte corrosion of NASICON-type LAGP. 108 Bosubabu et al 109 used a wetted polypropylene interlayer, and Baek et al 110 employed a MoS 2 coating on the LAGP surface. It is reported that an ionic conductive metalorganic framework (MOF)-incorporated layer (ZCPL) on one hand effectively eliminates cracks triggered by the redox reaction between LAGP and Li metal, while on the other hand infiltrates into the void/gaps of the LAGP surface, providing enough pathways for fast Li þ transport.…”

Section: Oxide Solid Electrolytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An examination and prospect of stabilizing Li metal anode in lithium–sulfur batteries: A review of latest progress

Song,

Su,

Liu

et al. 2023

Electron

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Li metal anode emerges as a formidable competitor among anode materials for lithium–sulfur (Li‐S) batteries; nevertheless, safety issues pose a significant hurdle in its path toward commercial viability. This review enumerates three historical challenges inherent to the Li metal anode: unavoidable volume expansion, multifunctional solid electrolyte interface formation, and uncontrollable lithium dendrite growth. In particular, when paired with a sulfur cathode, the Li anode presents an additional unique hurdle: the shuttle effect. To address these issues, this article offers a thorough examination of the latest innovations aimed at stabilizing the Li metal anode within Li‐S batteries. We categorize these approaches into five classifications: liquid electrolyte optimization, enhancement of non‐liquid‐state electrolytes, Li metal surface modification, Li anode architecture design, and Li alloy improvement. For several noteworthy results within these categories, we have compiled their electrochemical performance into tables, facilitating direct comparison. This detailed analysis illuminates feasible strategies and suggests directions warranting further exploration for optimizing the capability and safety of Li metal anodes in Li‐S batteries.

show abstract

Section: Oxide Solid Electrolytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bosubabu et al 109 . used a wetted polypropylene interlayer, and Baek et al 110 . employed a MoS 2 coating on the LAGP surface.…”

Section: Remaining LI Anode Stablementioning

confidence: 99%