Reader Response Theory and Orientalism: is<i>The Satanic Verses</i>Teachable?

Habib, M. A. R.; Habib, Tracy K.

doi:10.1080/02759527.1992.11932144

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…were depicted as 'civilized', 'modern' or 'advanced'. These theories provided moral support for the Europeans' hegemonic ambitions to colonize the world and also prescribed a moral responsibility for them to 'enlighten' the non-Europeans (Bel Habib 1992;Illman & Nynäs 2005). These ideas were occasionally questioned and old epithets were substituted for new ones, less burdened by history, and yet the Eurocentric worldview remained.…”

Section: Relativism Absolutism Particularism and Universalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

The blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies: A discussion on episteme and doxa in a field

Stier

2010

J. inc. comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As with other evolving fields within the realms of science the ontological assumptions and epistemological aspirations of intercultural communication studies are matters of debate and disagreement. Differently put, the very point of take-off from which studies in this field are conducted is seldom scrutinized. This being said, this paper identifies and discusses a number of blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies – e.g. the reluctance or inability to account for analytical ethnocentrism (‘home blindness’), heterocentrism (the unreflected and disproportionate focus on difference) or xenocentrism (the unreflected and disproportionate focus on ‘the other’). Additionally, normativism (the unreflected assumption that intercultural communication has desirable effects on people’s prejudices), cultural relativism versus absolutism, and particularism versus universalism are discussed. It is concluded that if the blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies are overlooked, and thus the researcher is held as a cultural constant, the understanding of intercultural communication as interaction between two unavoidably and equally cultural interlocutors is deficient. Inspired by classical hermeneutics and discourse analysis it is therefore argued that intercultural communication studies researchers must declare their ontological assumptions and epistemological aspirations more actively and systematically.

show abstract

Section: Relativism Absolutism Particularism and Universalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

The blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies: A discussion on episteme and doxa in a field

Stier

2010

J. inc. comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reader Response Theory and Orientalism: isThe Satanic VersesTeachable?

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

The blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies: A discussion on episteme and doxa in a field

The blindspots and biases of intercultural communication studies: A discussion on episteme and doxa in a field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About