2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(02)01205-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real and apparent loss suppression in MgB2 superconducting composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since β > α holds for any value of the geometrical and material characteristics involved, B 0 max (B 0 ) < B m max (B 0 ) ensues throughout, which confirms that the predicted enhancement of the critical field, disclosed by equation (26), like the concomitant attenuation of the external field, revealed by equation (30), cannot be exclusively ascribed to the shielding effect of the magnetic sheath, as argued in some previous attempts 21,41,42,43 . To appraise the relevance of the above results, we take a MgB 2 filament with radius R = 5.0 · 10 −4 m covered by a Fe sheath of thickness d = 2.5 · 10 −4 m and relative permeability µ = 50 (Refs.…”
Section: B Finite Curved Geometrysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since β > α holds for any value of the geometrical and material characteristics involved, B 0 max (B 0 ) < B m max (B 0 ) ensues throughout, which confirms that the predicted enhancement of the critical field, disclosed by equation (26), like the concomitant attenuation of the external field, revealed by equation (30), cannot be exclusively ascribed to the shielding effect of the magnetic sheath, as argued in some previous attempts 21,41,42,43 . To appraise the relevance of the above results, we take a MgB 2 filament with radius R = 5.0 · 10 −4 m covered by a Fe sheath of thickness d = 2.5 · 10 −4 m and relative permeability µ = 50 (Refs.…”
Section: B Finite Curved Geometrysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Notice also, that the above studied modification of the Bean-Livingston barrier is not reduced to the shielding effect of the magnetic sheath solely 25,36,37,38 because the latter does not account for the magnetic flux expelling from the filament itself. For example, in the limit R 1 ≫ λ, d the maximum field on the superconductor surface amounts to H max = 2H 0 /(1 + µd/R 1 ) while for the shielding of the normal core it is H max = H 0 /(1 + µd/2R 1 ) (see Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…31,32 As was observed in recent experiments, such structures exhibit enhanced superconducting critical currents over a wide range of external magnetic field 31,[33][34][35] as well as a strong reduction of ac losses in the external field. [36][37][38] At the same time, a theoretical description of the influence of soft-magnet shielding on the current-carrying properties of type-II superconductor filaments is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. To facilitate further considerations, we refer to an assumption invoked in previous works 9,10 , viz. that the total magnetic induction in the SC core can be decomposed according to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%