2011
DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.006741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time determination of laser beam quality by modal decomposition

Abstract: We present a real-time method to determine the beam propagation ratio M2 of laser beams. The all-optical measurement of modal amplitudes yields M2 parameters conform to the ISO standard method. The experimental technique is simple and fast, which allows to investigate laser beams under conditions inaccessible to other methods.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was orientated horizontally (x-direction) and vertically (y-direction) parallel to the mode field orientations in the hologram. As the correlation filter, different chrome masks, which were adapted to the fibers under test, were applied allowing for real-time modal decomposition of the fiber output [50]. Two different step-index fibers (A and B) and a multicore fiber (C) [51] were investigated, whose parameters are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was orientated horizontally (x-direction) and vertically (y-direction) parallel to the mode field orientations in the hologram. As the correlation filter, different chrome masks, which were adapted to the fibers under test, were applied allowing for real-time modal decomposition of the fiber output [50]. Two different step-index fibers (A and B) and a multicore fiber (C) [51] were investigated, whose parameters are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Determination of 4σ -size of noticeably non-Gaussian beams becomes too time consuming. Express techniques 66,67 are not regularly applied. Introducing M 2 into the Gaussian beam equations suggests the caustic symmetry 37,62,64 that is never asserted for an aberrated beam.…”
Section: Laser Beam Shape Position and Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, some techniques [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] have been developed to measure the dynamic beam quality M 2 factor, such as the Hartmann wavefront sensor [15,16], but it was shown to yield inaccurate results for multimode beams [17,18]. Other methods to perform M 2 comply with ISO11146 techniques, for example, multi-plane imaging using distortion diffraction gratings [19], optical field reconstruction using modal decomposition [20,21], and spatial light modulator method [22]. The self-reference interferometer wavefront sensor (SRI-WFS) method [23,24] is another effective method for real-time measurement of M 2 factor which was developed recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%