Reappraising cognitive control: normal reactive adjustments following conflict processing are abolished by proactive emotion regulation

Abstract

The congruency sequence effect (CSE) reflected by the influence of the congruency of the previous trial on the current one translates improved cognitive control (CC). Yet, it remains debated whether reactive or proactive control processes mostly contribute to this effect. To address this question, we administered a Stroop task controlling for effects of feature repetition and contingency learning to a large group of participants, where we manipulated the frequency of incongruent trials in a block-wise fashion to induce either proactive (high conflict frequency) or reactive (low conflict frequency) control. Moreover, as the presentation of trial-by-trial evaluative feedback could influence control processes operating at a local level, we compared effect of evaluative vs. neutral feedback on the CSE, for each control mode separately. We tested the prediction that CSE should be influenced by conflict frequency and feedback type concurrently. Results showed that when evaluative feedback was used, the CSE was increased if conflict frequency was low, confirming that the CSE stemmed from reactive control mainly. If conflict frequency was high, a different sequence effect was observed. The use of neutral feedback abolished the modulation of the CSE by conflict frequency. Moreover, correlation results showed that reappraisal, corresponding to a proactive emotion regulation strategy, was negatively related to the CSE in this condition, suggesting that proactive control can alleviate the reactive dominance of the CSE. Altogether, these results suggest that CC is flexible, and its expression depends on the subtle balance between proactive and reactive control processes.

Stereotype-based priming without stereotype activation: A tale of two priming tasks

“… SCT: Stereotype Classification Task; DIC: deviance information criterion; v : drift rate; z : starting point; t 0 : non-decision time. A DIC difference of 5 is strong evidence for a model ( Tipples, 2018 ). …”

Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades predict problem-solving via analysis

“…Afterward, the problem words were erased and participants had to report, via button press, whether they had solved the problem via insight or analysis. Self-reports for insight and analytic solving have been established in numerous behavioral and neuroimaging studies (e.g., Cristofori et al, 2018 ; Jung-Beeman et al, 2004 ; Kounios et al, 2006 ; Laukkonen and Tangen, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2018 ; Salvi et al, 2016a ,b; Santarnecchi et al, 2019 ; Salvi et al, 2020 ; Salvi and Bowden, 2019 ). No feedback was given to participants regarding whether the solution they had provided was correct.…”

A mobile approach-avoidance task

“…Consequently, most existing AAT research has focused on stable approach-avoidance tendencies. Research on dynamic tendencies, on the other hand, for example towards food, has so far yielded inconsistent findings (for a summary, see Meule et al, 2019 ). It is, however, plausible that such dynamic approach-avoidance tendencies exist.…”