2005
DOI: 10.2174/1573409052952314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Docking and Scoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure decreases the average energy of the chromosome ensemble by transmitting favorable structural characteristics from one population to another, reducing therefore, the conformational space to be explored. The GA routine is recursively executed and, after a reasonable number of conformational search-and-evaluation cycles, converges to a conformation (chromosome) corresponding to the global energy minimum [36].…”
Section: Conformational Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure decreases the average energy of the chromosome ensemble by transmitting favorable structural characteristics from one population to another, reducing therefore, the conformational space to be explored. The GA routine is recursively executed and, after a reasonable number of conformational search-and-evaluation cycles, converges to a conformation (chromosome) corresponding to the global energy minimum [36].…”
Section: Conformational Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it needs to be reiterated that even the most sophisticated methods of free energy estimation are not wholly accurate. In the absence of a single function that is valid for many or all targets [150], a strategy of merging several diverse scoring functions to form a consensus has emerged. This was proposed by Charifson [151] because the combination of diverse functions could potentially compensate for the weaknesses of individual functions, and thus yield better overall scoring.…”
Section: Consensus Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variety of different approaches for a solution of this problem has been applied [6,8,162,163,164,165] ranging from fragment-based (e.g., DOCK [166,169], FlexX [6,8,11,170], SLIDE [171], SURFLEX [172], and GLIDE [173,174,175]) over stochastic optimization methods for finding the global minimum (e.g., GOLD [176,177,178], AutoDock [179,180], PLANTS [181,182,183], ICM [184], QXP [185], and PRO_LEADS [186,187]) to multiconformer docking (e.g., FRED [188]). …”
Section: Influence Of Ph and Protonation States In Docking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%