Recent developments in time-of-flight PET

Abstract

While the first time-of-flight (TOF)-positron emission tomography (PET) systems were already built in the early 1980s, limited clinical studies were acquired on these scanners. PET was still a research tool, and the available TOF-PET systems were experimental. Due to a combination of low stopping power and limited spatial resolution (caused by limited light output of the scintillators), these systems could not compete with bismuth germanate (BGO)-based PET scanners. Developments on TOF system were limited for about a decade but started again around 2000. The combination of fast photomultipliers, scintillators with high density, modern electronics, and faster computing power for image reconstruction have made it possible to introduce this principle in clinical TOF-PET systems. This paper reviews recent developments in system design, image reconstruction, corrections, and the potential in new applications for TOF-PET. After explaining the basic principles of time-of-flight, the difficulties in detector technology and electronics to obtain a good and stable timing resolution are shortly explained. The available clinical systems and prototypes under development are described in detail. The development of this type of PET scanner also requires modified image reconstruction with accurate modeling and correction methods. The additional dimension introduced by the time difference motivates a shift from sinogram- to listmode-based reconstruction. This reconstruction is however rather slow and therefore rebinning techniques specific for TOF data have been proposed. The main motivation for TOF-PET remains the large potential for image quality improvement and more accurate quantification for a given number of counts. The gain is related to the ratio of object size and spatial extent of the TOF kernel and is therefore particularly relevant for heavy patients, where image quality degrades significantly due to increased attenuation (low counts) and high scatter fractions. The original calculations for the gain were based on analytical methods. Recent publications for iterative reconstruction have shown that it is difficult to quantify TOF gain into one factor. The gain depends on the measured distribution, the location within the object, and the count rate. In a clinical situation, the gain can be used to either increase the standardized uptake value (SUV) or reduce the image acquisition time or administered dose. The localized nature of the TOF kernel makes it possible to utilize local tomography reconstruction or to separate emission from transmission data. The introduction of TOF also improves the joint estimation of transmission and emission images from emission data only. TOF is also interesting for new applications of PET-like isotopes with low branching ratio for positron fraction. The local nature also reduces the need for fine angular sampling, which makes TOF interesting for limited angle situations like breast PET and online dose imaging in proton or hadron therapy. The aim of this review is to introduce the reader i...

Hybrid Imaging: Instrumentation and Data Processing

“…The concept of ToF assumes that the annihilation point of two photons originating from a single positron annihilation can be calculated from their travel time differences [89][90][91].…”

Progress in the Nuclear Imaging Techniques for Cognitive Studies

“…The Time of Flight-PET advanced in the 2000s after a long time internal of 20years as TOF-PET was started in 1980s the current clinical TOF-PET-CT has time of flight in the range 500-600 ps [4]. For this process to occur it needs a fast scintillator.…”

“…For this process to occur it needs a fast scintillator. The scintillators used in TOF-PET-CT are LSO, LYSO, and LaBr 3 , and the new scintillators are LuI 3 and LuAg (CE or Pr) [24] Properties of Scintillators used in TOP-PET [4] …”

“…Recently a cardiac Rb-82 imaging has been done in 3D mode surpassing substantially 2D image in photon detection. [7,4] A fig 3 [12] of four ring imaging system with and without separating plane. Where A is strictly 2D, B is modified 2D allowing LOR, C is fully 3D without septa and allowing LOR [12] Progress in the Nuclear Imaging …”

Early post-STEMI PET, a judicious investment?

“…The availability of fast photomultipliers, high-density scintillators, modern electronics, and faster computational capabilities, including time-of-flight systems, has made it possible to optimize perfusion imaging. 5 Thus, PET provides the best option for accurately characterizing the myocardial perfusion status. Because of the clinical setting of the study by Ghotbi et al, PET was performed only during rest for reasons of safety in order to refrain patients from undergoing a pharmacological stress test.…”