2023
DOI: 10.1155/2023/2795722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Progress in the Classification and Operation of Sacral Fractures

Abstract: Most sacral fractures are caused by high-energy, violent injuries, often accompanied by lumbosacral plexus injuries, which can cause instability of the posterior pelvic ring or lumbosacral junction in severe cases. Currently, the most commonly used clinical classification methods are Denis classification, Tile classification, Isler classification, and Denis II classification. In recent years, lumbosacral vertebral injury classification and injury degree scoring systems have often been applied clinically as the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with advanced imaging now showing a higher prevalence of osteoporotic-and stress-related sacral fractures, management based solely on these classification systems is no longer widely agreed upon. This is because these systems emphasize high-energy traumatic mechanisms, often with associated neurologic or pelvic ring injuries, that may warrant more aggressive interventions such as sacroiliac screws or spinopelvic fixation, than sacral insufficiency fractures [18]. Appropriate decision-making between surgical or non-surgical management requires an understanding that sacral insufficiency fractures frequently present in older patients with low bone mineral density following low energy injuries and, as such, create progressive instability from the accumulation of additional fractures [19].…”
Section: Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with advanced imaging now showing a higher prevalence of osteoporotic-and stress-related sacral fractures, management based solely on these classification systems is no longer widely agreed upon. This is because these systems emphasize high-energy traumatic mechanisms, often with associated neurologic or pelvic ring injuries, that may warrant more aggressive interventions such as sacroiliac screws or spinopelvic fixation, than sacral insufficiency fractures [18]. Appropriate decision-making between surgical or non-surgical management requires an understanding that sacral insufficiency fractures frequently present in older patients with low bone mineral density following low energy injuries and, as such, create progressive instability from the accumulation of additional fractures [19].…”
Section: Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While trauma-induced lumbosacral plexus injuries are relatively uncommon due to the protective shield of muscles and bones, this protection also poses significant treatment challenges 2 . Furthermore, in recent years, lumbosacral plexus injuries have been on the rise due to various factors such as lower limb nerve blocks, surgical mishaps, pelvic radiation therapy, and poisonings 3 , 4 . These diverse causes can cause severe damage to the lumbosacral nerves, leading to a lifetime of lower limb motor and sensory pain, as well as urinary and bowel disorders, substantially diminishing the quality of life for affected individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%