2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1701.06829
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent results in Euclidean dynamical triangulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 shows the variation of these quantities along the transition line. Clearly D S runs to small (D S ∼ 1.5) values in the UV which is consistent with the earlier EDT studies [24], and CDT studies [25]. In the IR regime the spectral dimension D S (∞) is larger with D S (∞) varying from 1.82 − 2.52.…”
Section: Spectral Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…12 shows the variation of these quantities along the transition line. Clearly D S runs to small (D S ∼ 1.5) values in the UV which is consistent with the earlier EDT studies [24], and CDT studies [25]. In the IR regime the spectral dimension D S (∞) is larger with D S (∞) varying from 1.82 − 2.52.…”
Section: Spectral Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…where a = 4.02, b = 119, and c = 54. A similar analysis within Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations [45] obtained D s (T ) = 3.94±0.16 and D s (T ) = 1.44±0.19 for the large and small distance values when extrapolating to the continuum and infinite volume limits. Generalizing [46], the scale-dependent spectral dimension along a fixed asymptotically safe renormalization group trajectory has been computed in [47], leading to a three plateau structure with D s (T ) = 4, D s (T ) = 4/3, and D s (T ) = 2 at large, intermediate, and short distances, respectively (also see [48] for a review).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%