15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-3388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Sonic Boom Propagation Studies at Gulfstream Aerospace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the four temporal instances evaluated, the maximum range in undertrack level was 11.7 PLdB during a six-month period as well as a 12 h period. These results are in agreement with other studies performed by Salamone [31] and Heimann [30]. Furthermore, only the undertrack (i.e., sound emitted directly below the aircraft) perceived level was evaluated, but it is possible that the offtrack signature leads to even higher loudness magnitudes [5].…”
Section: A Examples Of Spatial and Temporal Variationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the four temporal instances evaluated, the maximum range in undertrack level was 11.7 PLdB during a six-month period as well as a 12 h period. These results are in agreement with other studies performed by Salamone [31] and Heimann [30]. Furthermore, only the undertrack (i.e., sound emitted directly below the aircraft) perceived level was evaluated, but it is possible that the offtrack signature leads to even higher loudness magnitudes [5].…”
Section: A Examples Of Spatial and Temporal Variationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…by considering only one instance in time [32], averaging atmospheric profiles across years [31], sampling a sparse selection of days throughout the years [3,30], evaluating only locations on the flight path [32,34,35], or selecting locations that are representative of different climates [31,33]. However, this study proposes a broader analysis of atmospheric states, allowing analysis of other factors previously not studied and validating previous results from the available literature.…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation