1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-2977(72)80030-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recherche et identification des anticorps anti-érythrocytaires par voie automatique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-D test sera were compared to an anti-D working standard by a Polybrene method derived from that ofLalezari [8] and a TDA method devised in 1972 by Guimbretière et al [3], In certain cases, discrepant results were obtained between the two meth ods and data were expressed as a ratio of reactivity for the test anti-D serum: PTR. These discrepant results were not related to the low reproductibility of such assays, which has been found to lie between ± 14% [5] and+30% [10] since PTR ranged from 0.48 to 3.27.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anti-D test sera were compared to an anti-D working standard by a Polybrene method derived from that ofLalezari [8] and a TDA method devised in 1972 by Guimbretière et al [3], In certain cases, discrepant results were obtained between the two meth ods and data were expressed as a ratio of reactivity for the test anti-D serum: PTR. These discrepant results were not related to the low reproductibility of such assays, which has been found to lie between ± 14% [5] and+30% [10] since PTR ranged from 0.48 to 3.27.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these methods is a Polybrene test derived from that of Lalezari [8], the other method, devised by Guimbretière et al [3], used trypsin-treated red blood cells (RBC) with addition of the macromole cules albumin and dextran (TAD methIn certain cases, these two automated methods gave discrepant results though the same anti-D working standard was used. It was noted that this abnormality remained quite constant for samples of the same per son if there was no restimulation and that no discrepancies occurred when pools of anti-D were tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For agglutination tests, human polyclonal anti-A and anti-B antibodies, murine monoclonal anti-H (NaM19-7E1 I), or Dolichos bflorus lectin (all reagents from our blood centre), were appropriately diluted in a solution containing 15% bovine serum albumin (1971). Agglutinated cells were quantified on an automatic chain (Technicon) as described (Guimbretiere et al, 1972).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%