1979
DOI: 10.3406/bmsap.1979.1945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommandations pour déterminer l'âge et le sexe sur le squelette

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
27

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Subadult age at death was assessed using dental and skeletal criteria (Ubelaker, 1989;Scheuer and Black, 2000). Adult sex was estimated based on the morphology of os coxa (Bruzek, 2002) and skull (Ferembach et al, 1979). Field evidence indicates a wide range of mortuary practices involving primary burial in various positions, post-decomposition removal of skulls and long bones, and secondary deposits of heated (Valentin and Clark, 2013) or unheated bone, as well as secondary deposit of isolated skulls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subadult age at death was assessed using dental and skeletal criteria (Ubelaker, 1989;Scheuer and Black, 2000). Adult sex was estimated based on the morphology of os coxa (Bruzek, 2002) and skull (Ferembach et al, 1979). Field evidence indicates a wide range of mortuary practices involving primary burial in various positions, post-decomposition removal of skulls and long bones, and secondary deposits of heated (Valentin and Clark, 2013) or unheated bone, as well as secondary deposit of isolated skulls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El sexo de los individuos se ha establecido mediante las características morfológicas del cráneo y la pelvis (Ferembach et al 1979;Byers 2002). …”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified
“…Biological sex determination was based on methods which relied on classical morphological parameters of sexual dimorphism, namely morphological features of the pelvis such as the presence of a subpubic concavity, ventral arc and preauricular sulcus, the thickness of the ischiopubic ramus and the greater sciatic notch shape in the pelvis bone (Ferembach et al, 1979;Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994). In addition, morphological cranium characteristics of the skull, such as the robusticity of the nuchal crest, the size of the mastoid process, the sharpness of the supraorbital margin, the prominence of the glabella and the projection of the mental eminence were also used (Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Human Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%