“…In the domains of AGREE II evaluated (Figure 2A, Table S2), the mean score was 59.4% (SD 18.3%) for “scope and purpose”, 39.4% (SD 21.1%) for “stakeholder involvement”, 32.3% (SD 20.2%) for “rigour of development”, 59.3% (SD 18.2%) for “clarity and presentation”, 27.4% (SD 18.7%) for “applicability”, 42.5% (SD 23.5%) for “editorial independence” and 44.5% (SD 17.5%) for the “overall rating”. As part of the AGREE II appraisal, the reviewers recommended four of the guidelines analysed (11.8%), 57,63,66,80 12 (35.3%) 47‐51,55,59‐61,71,75,76 were recommended with modifications, and 18 (52.9%) 46,52‐54,56,58,62,64,67‐70,72‐74,77‐79 were not recommended for use. Only three guidelines (8.8%) scored over 60% in “Rigour of development domain” and are considered high quality.…”