Recovery from natural disaster: A numerical investigation based on the convergence approach

Hosoya, Kei

doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.029

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Pengurangan risiko pra bencana menjadi perhatian khusus untuk mendukung pemulihan pada beberapa aspek ekonomi, layanan sosial maupun psikologis masyarakat terdampak bencana setelah terjadinya bencana (Erdik & Goyet, 1991). Sementara itu upaya pengurangan risiko pasca bencana melalui ketahanan ekonomi dan sosial yang diperlihatkan dengan kekuatan kelembagaan diperlukan untuk mempersingkat periode pemulihan (Hosoya, 2016).…”

Section: Gambar 1 Tren Kerusakan Fasilitas Akibat Bencana DI Indonesia Tahun 2011-2017unclassified

Pengaruh Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah terhadap Partisipasi Pelatihan Bencana Rumah Tangga

Dewanggajati

2021

JMSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disaster coping management is important to be well managed by the government and all stakeholders because Indonesia is a disaster-prone area. Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is needed because of the number of disasters occurring recently have serious impacts on the economy, social and environment. This study aims to look at the effect of education institution and regional disaster management institutions (BPBD) on household participation of disaster training as an effort of DRR. Literature also revealed that regional and households characteristics have an important role in implementing DRR.The design of this study uses quantitative logit regression analysis using secondary data from 297,276 household respondents from the 2017 National Socio-Economic Survey (SUSENAS). The results showed the disaster institutions at the district level, secondary education and universities has a significant impact and was able to provide an increase in probability of household disaster training participation. Abstrak: Manajemen penanggulangan bencana merupakan hal yang penting dikelola dengan baik oleh pemerintah dan semua elemen masyarakat karena Indonesia memiliki wilayah rawan bencana. Pengurangan risiko bencana (PRB) diperlukan mengingat banyaknya kejadian bencana dewasa ini berdampak cukup serius pada perekonomian, sosial maupun lingkungan hidup. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh lembaga pendidikan serta keberadaan lembaga penanggulangan bencana daerah terhadap partisipasi pelatihan atau simulasi bencana rumah tangga sebagai upaya PRB. Literatur juga mengungkapkan bahwa karakteristik daerah memiliki peran penting dalam implementasi PRB secara optimum. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan analisis kuantitatif regresi logit dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder 297,276 responden rumah tangga dari Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (SUSENAS) tahun 2017. Hasil menunjukan keberadaan lembaga penanggulangan bencana kab/kota dan lembaga pendidikan di daerah berupa pendidikan menengah, perguruan tinggi memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan dapat memberikan peningkatan terhadap kemungkinan partisipasi pelatihan kebencanaan rumah tangga.

show abstract

Section: Gambar 1 Tren Kerusakan Fasilitas Akibat Bencana DI Indonesia Tahun 2011-2017unclassified

Pengaruh Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah terhadap Partisipasi Pelatihan Bencana Rumah Tangga

Dewanggajati

2021

JMSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These studies, such as Hamdan et al (2011), Hosoya (2016), Motoyama (2017), Marto et al (2018), Boccard (2018), Songwathama (2018), Benali et al (2018), and Bhat and Mishra (2018) use theoretical and empirical economic models. This part of the literature mainly focuses on the research methods of economics and lacks the research methods of other academic subjects.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hamdan, Karil, and Othman (2011) used Pearson's chi‐square to analyse the climate variabilities associated with production losses and found that when water temperatures changed (caused by climate change) and epidemics (affecting aquaculture) emerged, effective strategies were needed to assist aquaculture farmers. Hosoya (2016) studied the economic recovery after the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami in 2011. The results show that the efficiency of infrastructure provision and the amount of capital have a significant impact on post‐disaster reconstruction.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first main research area has been focused on disaster risk reduction; for example, Iwata, Ito, and Managi (2014) examined disaster damage in Japan, Mashi, Abubakar, Dominic, and Amina (2018) reviewed Nigeriaʼs disaster response abilities, and Lam and Kuipers (2019) studied damage reduction and recovery after the 2015 Nepalese earthquake. The second research area has been focused on the economic and social impacts of natural disasters; for example, Hosoya (2016) studied the economic impacts of the Japanese Great Eastern Earthquake and Tsunami, Marto, Papageorgiou, and Klyuev (2018) explored the impact of natural disasters on economies, and Songwathana (2018) explored the relationships between natural disasters and economic development. The third main area of research has been natural disaster risk assessments; for example, Brown, Daigneault, Tjernström, and Zou (2018) researched Fijian household risk attitudes toward the likelihood and severity of natural disasters over the next 20 years and found that extreme events could change individual risk perceptions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of natural disaster treatment efficiency in 27 Chinese provinces

Liu

Chiu

Lin

et al. 2021

Natural Resources Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on disaster mitigation and prevention has tended to focus on the impact of natural disasters on the economy and strategies for risk reduction and mitigation. There has been significant research on disaster prevention and treatment efficiencies, however, most analyses have employed traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) radial models that do not consider undesirable output. Differing from previous research, this study employed a non‐radial directional distance function DEA that included an undesirable output analysis to evaluate the natural hazard management efficiency in 27 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions in China. Results show that: (a) economic losses from natural disasters were lower due to the increase in natural disaster prevention and control program expenditure; (b) the overall natural disaster control efficiencies varied significantly across the provinces; and (c) Tibet and Xinjiang, which have the lowest general disaster prevention efficiencies, could benefit from following the example set by provinces such as Sichuan and Guangdong, which have the highest disaster prevention efficiencies. Disaster prevention efficiencies measure the overall performance of each province in disaster prevention. This efficiency index is measured by input (disaster prevention expenditure) and output (number of natural disasters prevented and natural disaster economic losses), and its calculation method is the ratio of the actual value of each input and output to the target value. This ratio is called the efficiency score, and the efficiency score is between 0 and 1. An efficiency score of 1 represents the most efficient.

show abstract