2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Back-Projection Network for Video Super-Resolution

Abstract: We proposed a novel architecture for the problem of video super-resolution. We integrate spatial and temporal contexts from continuous video frames using a recurrent encoder-decoder module, that fuses multi-frame information with the more traditional, single frame super-resolution path for the target frame. In contrast to most prior work where frames are pooled together by stacking or warping, our model, the Recurrent Back-Projection Network (RBPN) treats each context frame as a separate source of information.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
384
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 483 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
384
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our EDVR method with nine algorithms: RCAN [52], DeepSR [19], BayesSR [21], VESPCN [2], SPMC [37], TOFlow [48], FRVSR [32], DUF [10] and RBPN [6] on three testing datasets: Vid4 [21], Vimeo-90K-T [48] and REDS4. Most previous methods use different training sets and different down-sampling kernels, making the comparisons difficult.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our EDVR method with nine algorithms: RCAN [52], DeepSR [19], BayesSR [21], VESPCN [2], SPMC [37], TOFlow [48], FRVSR [32], DUF [10] and RBPN [6] on three testing datasets: Vid4 [21], Vimeo-90K-T [48] and REDS4. Most previous methods use different training sets and different down-sampling kernels, making the comparisons difficult.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our DNLN with several state-of-theart SISR and VSR methods: DBPN [5], RCAN [27], VESPCN [1], TOFlow [26], FRVSR [18], DUF [8] and RBPN [6]. Note that most previous methods are trained with different datasets and we just compare with the results they provided.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DUF and RBPN could reproduce part of the HR patterns compared with other methods, it is obvious that our DNLN is the unique approach to restore the abundant details and clean edges. Table 3 presents the quantitative outcomes of Vimeo-90K-T. As suggested in [6], we classified the video clips into three different groups (e.g. slow, medium and fast) according to the motion velocity.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this mixture, the CNN may generate the blurry HR frame. Recently techniques [20][21][22] presented pipeline architecture to address these challenges. The pipeline architecture follows feature extraction, feature alignment, fusion and frame reconstruction.…”
Section: Align-filter and Learn Video Super Resolution Using Deep Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method uses a single frame processing which leads to generate the suboptimal outcome in case of occlusion. Recently, Haris et al [22] addressed this issues and developed recurrent back-projection network (RBPN) for SR. In this method, the network processes multiple frames where spatial and temporal information is extracted and fused using recurrent encoder-decoder module.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%