2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red and brown seaweeds extracts: A source of biologically active compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the comparison of extraction yield between different studies is difficult due to various methods and solvents used, our yield values were comparable with those of other studies. For example, G. gracilis ’ yield of extraction using hot water was 24.63% [ 50 ], being close to our yield of 25.4% after 80% v / v methanol extraction. In addition, our C. amentacea ’s extraction yield of 34.1% was similar to the yield of 31% of macroalgae after 50% v / v ethanol extraction [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the comparison of extraction yield between different studies is difficult due to various methods and solvents used, our yield values were comparable with those of other studies. For example, G. gracilis ’ yield of extraction using hot water was 24.63% [ 50 ], being close to our yield of 25.4% after 80% v / v methanol extraction. In addition, our C. amentacea ’s extraction yield of 34.1% was similar to the yield of 31% of macroalgae after 50% v / v ethanol extraction [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…They also concluded that polyphenols’ identification from marine macroalgae presents many difficulties due to there being complex samples and polyphenols’ presence at low concentrations [ 64 ]. The differences in polyphenols’ determination between our study and other studies may be attributed to different factors such as geographical location and season of collection, as well as extraction and chemical analysis methods [ 50 , 51 , 56 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The iron-chelating activity of each fraction was estimated by the method described by Sapatinha et al with modifications [ 25 ]. Briefly, 50 μL of each sample solution and 50 μL of 1 mM FeCl 2 were mixed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%