2008
DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2008.11891055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red Green Colour Blindness among the Lingayath of Karnataka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage distributions of color blindness in the different ethnic groups and countries are found to be variable: in our study the prevalence of color blindness among the male students (8.46%) were found to be similar recorded in America, 8.0% (Mueller and Young, 1995), Tehran, 8.18% (Modarres et al, 1996), Iraq, 8.19% (Al-Amood et al, 1981), Denmark, 8.7% (Norn, 1997), Jordan, 8.72% (Al-Aqtum andAl-Qawasmeh, 2001) and India, 8.73% (Shah et al, 2013). However, the prevalence of the color blindness among male students in our present study is higher than that of Pakistan, 1.1% (Alam et al, 2008), India, 1.12% (Dakshayani and Gangadhar, 2006), 2.4% (Kalamma et al, 2008) and 2.4% (Luxmi and Kapooe, 2011), China, 3.0% (Huang et al, 1990), Nepal, 3.8 (Niroula and Saha, 2010), Philippine, 5.17% (Cruz et al, 2010) and Malaysia, 6.7% (Balasundaram and Reddy, 2006).…”
Section: Disscusioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The percentage distributions of color blindness in the different ethnic groups and countries are found to be variable: in our study the prevalence of color blindness among the male students (8.46%) were found to be similar recorded in America, 8.0% (Mueller and Young, 1995), Tehran, 8.18% (Modarres et al, 1996), Iraq, 8.19% (Al-Amood et al, 1981), Denmark, 8.7% (Norn, 1997), Jordan, 8.72% (Al-Aqtum andAl-Qawasmeh, 2001) and India, 8.73% (Shah et al, 2013). However, the prevalence of the color blindness among male students in our present study is higher than that of Pakistan, 1.1% (Alam et al, 2008), India, 1.12% (Dakshayani and Gangadhar, 2006), 2.4% (Kalamma et al, 2008) and 2.4% (Luxmi and Kapooe, 2011), China, 3.0% (Huang et al, 1990), Nepal, 3.8 (Niroula and Saha, 2010), Philippine, 5.17% (Cruz et al, 2010) and Malaysia, 6.7% (Balasundaram and Reddy, 2006).…”
Section: Disscusioncontrasting
confidence: 60%