2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced hemostatic effects with drospirenone-based oral contraceptives containing estetrol vs. ethinyl estradiol

Abstract: The reduction in coagulation markers suggests an anticoagulant effect from DRSP. The indications of a low thrombosis risk for E4 preparations should be validated in larger studies. IMPLICATION STATEMENT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we show that estetrol prevents hypertension and vascular hypertrophy induced by AngII and allows FMR. These experimental data complement previous clinical studies reporting that estetrol has less effect than ethinyl‐estradiol on hepatic‐derived hemostatic biomarkers69 and, therefore, could be the only oral estrogen that does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events. Because estetrol, in combination with a progestin, is able to block ovulation, this fetal estrogen is being evaluated as both a new contraceptive and a new hormonal treatment for menopause 69…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Herein, we show that estetrol prevents hypertension and vascular hypertrophy induced by AngII and allows FMR. These experimental data complement previous clinical studies reporting that estetrol has less effect than ethinyl‐estradiol on hepatic‐derived hemostatic biomarkers69 and, therefore, could be the only oral estrogen that does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events. Because estetrol, in combination with a progestin, is able to block ovulation, this fetal estrogen is being evaluated as both a new contraceptive and a new hormonal treatment for menopause 69…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…20 Interestingly, E4 treatment does not increase the level of hepaticderived coagulation factors, and therefore appears as an interesting new selective ER modulator because it might not increase the risk of thrombosis. 21 The biological effects of estrogens are mediated by their binding to the two ERs (ERa and ERb), leading to conformational changes, dimerization, and recruitment of coactivators into the nucleus, where they interact with estrogen response elements or other transcription factors to modulate the transcription of target genes. 22 Ligand-induced transcriptional activity of ER involves the action of two distinct activation functions (AFs), AF1 and AF2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two publications described the findings of a single-center study, involving 109 women, performed in the Netherlands, regarding the hemostatic and metabolic effects of E4 based COCs [8,9].…”
Section: Hemostatic and Metabolic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subgroup of subjects from this study, Kluft et al [9] evaluated E4 (at two different doses: 5 and 10 mg) with 3 mg DRSP in comparison with 20 µg EE and the same dose of DRSP on plasma levels of SHBG, angiotensinogen and 12 markers of hemostasis. The effects of 10 mg E4/DRSP on SHBG and angiotensinogen levels were only 15-20% that of EE/DRSP.…”
Section: Hemostatic and Metabolic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%