2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Toxicity With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (DSRCT): An Update on the Whole Abdominopelvic Radiation Therapy (WAP-RT) Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,[7][8][9] We also found that EPM are highly predictive of a poor prognosis. 5,24 The median OS after peritoneal CRS in patients with synchronous liver metastases was only 14.8 months, which is comparable to the results obtained with systemic chemotherapy alone. 2 Therefore, we believe that surgery is inappropriate for this group of patients, who should instead be treated with systemic chemotherapy alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…4,5,[7][8][9] We also found that EPM are highly predictive of a poor prognosis. 5,24 The median OS after peritoneal CRS in patients with synchronous liver metastases was only 14.8 months, which is comparable to the results obtained with systemic chemotherapy alone. 2 Therefore, we believe that surgery is inappropriate for this group of patients, who should instead be treated with systemic chemotherapy alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For pelvic malignancies, BM-sparing IMRT/ intensity-modulated proton therapy using specific dose constraints of the BM had theoretic benefit through dosimetric analysis. [19][20][21][22] Desai et al 23 demonstrated that BM-sparing IMRT reduced acute HT in patients with pelvic malignancies. For current IMRT treatment of thoracic malignancies, specific dose constraints of the BM were not followed, as none have been set.…”
Section: (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemo n = 234 No chemo n = 851 (15) 109 (15) 34 (14) 131 (15) 38 000-47 999 243 (22) 75 (20) 168 (24) 58 (25) 185 (22) 48 000-62 999 283 (26) 101 (27) 182 (26) 63 (27) (27) 104 (27) 190 (27) 55 (23) 239 (27) 7-12.9% 346 (32) 120 (32) 226 (32) 69 (29) 277 (33) 13-20.9% 244 (22) 90 (24) 154 (22) 61 (26) (15) 59 (16) 99 (14) 25 (11) 133 (16) R 2 297 (27) 89 (23) 208 (29) 88 (37) 209 (24) Chemotherapy 0.42 -Yes 234 (22) 87 (23) 147 (21) The univariate analysis identified male gender, age older than 50 years, comorbidity, tumor larger than 8 cm, positive surgical margins, absence of perioperative radiotherapy and/or radiotherapy dose <60…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%