Reducing Gadolinium Exposure in Patients Undergoing Monitoring for Meningiomas

Abstract

BackgroundDue to the non-malignant and slow-growing nature of many meningiomas, surveillance with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as an acceptable management plan. However, repeated imaging with goldstandard contrast-based studies may lead to contrast-associated adverse effects. Non-gadolinium T2 sequences may serve as a suitable alternative without the risk of adverse effects of contrast. Thus, this study sought to investigate the agreement between post-contrast T1 and non-gadolinium T2 MRI sequences in the measurement of meningioma growth. MethodologyThe Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU SOM) brain tumor database was used to create a cohort of meningioma patients and determine the number of patients who had T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied by readily measurable imaging from either T2 fast spin echo (FSE) or T2 fluidattenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. Measurements of the largest axial and perpendicular diameters of each tumor were conducted by two independent observers using T1 post-contrast, T2 FSE, and T2 FLAIR imaging series. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability between observers and agreement between measurements of tumor diameter among the different imaging sequences. ResultsIn total, 33 patients (average age = 72.1 ± 12.9 years, 90% female) with meningiomas were extracted from our database, with 22 (66.7%) undergoing T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied with readily measurable imaging from T2 FSE and/or T2 FLAIR sequences. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T1 axial and perpendicular diameters was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.83-0.97), respectively. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T2 axial perpendicular diameters was 0.93 (95% = CI 0.92-0.97) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.74-0.95), respectively. The agreements between the measurement of T1 and T2 FSE axial diameter by each observer were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.81-0.97). The agreements between the measurements of T1 and T2 FSE perpendicular diameter measurements by each observer were 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and 0.88 (95% CI = 0.73-0.95). ConclusionsTwo-thirds of our patients had meningiomas that were readily measurable on either T2 FSE or T2 FLAIR sequences. Additionally, there was excellent inter-rater reliability between the observers in our study as well as an agreement between individual measurements of T1 post-contrast and T2 FSE tumor diameters. These findings suggest that T2 FSE may serve as a safe and similarly effective surveillance method for the longterm management of meningioma patients.