2021
DOI: 10.1186/s42492-021-00083-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing metal artifacts by restricting negative pixels

Abstract: When the object contains metals, its x-ray computed tomography (CT) images are normally affected by streaking artifacts. These artifacts are mainly caused by the x-ray beam hardening effects, which deviate the measurements from their true values. One interesting observation of the metal artifacts is that certain regions of the metal artifacts often appear as negative pixel values. Our novel idea in this paper is to set up an objective function that restricts the negative pixel values in the image. We must poin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is inspired by the two observations that the metal artifacts often result in dark/bright streaks radiating from the metals [ 25 ] and negative image pixels around the metals [ 26 ]. The streaking artifacts increase the TV norm of the non-metal regions of the image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This paper is inspired by the two observations that the metal artifacts often result in dark/bright streaks radiating from the metals [ 25 ] and negative image pixels around the metals [ 26 ]. The streaking artifacts increase the TV norm of the non-metal regions of the image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attenuation coefficients cannot be negative. These two effects were dealt with in two papers, separately [ 16 , 26 ]. The goal of this current paper is to combine these two methods into one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another version of inpainting is more successful. [12][13][14] This version is different from the previous version in that the newer version estimate the projections with the metals in the object. It does not average the neighboring values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%