2018
DOI: 10.4018/ijrcm.2018040101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Risk of Wrong Choice in Group Decision Making by Optimal Weight Allocating to Decision Makers

Abstract: How to determine a weight for decision makers (DMs) is one of the key issues in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM). While, some experts (or DMs) clearly wiser and more powerful in such matters than others, it has often seen that experts play their roles with same weights of importance. Meanwhile, it will lead to the wrong choice (or decision risk) and loss of values. Since, in the absence of any other standards about how to reduce this potential risk for bias, in this article, based on judgment m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hajiagha, Mahdiraji,Hashemi,andTurskis(2015),investigatedtheproblemofweightdeterminationamong decisionmakersbyextendinganalgorithmtakenfromtheTOPSIStechniques.YangandDu(2015) determinedtheweightsofDMsinthegroupdecisionenvironmentviaanglecosineandprojection method. Yang,Du,Wang,andLiang(2017)presentedanovelapproachfordeterminingtheweights ofdecisionmakersbasedonroughgroupdecisioninMAGDMproblems.Yue(2017)determined theweightsofDMsbyusinganentropymeasure.Azadfallah(2018a)extendedVIKORandTOPSIS methodforsolvingMAGDMproblemsundercrispandintervaldata.Inaddition,threenewentropybased approachesareintroducedtodetermine theimportanceofDMsin groupdecision-making process.Inaddition, Azadfallah(2018b)proposedtwonewsystematicapproachtoevaluaterelative weightsofDMsinthegroupdecisionenvironmentbyextendingtwoalgorithmtakenfromthecrisp (the correlation-based approach), and interval (the ideal-based approach) TOPSIS techniques, to reducingtheriskofwrongchoice(ordecisionrisk)ingroupdecisionmakingprocess.However, mostofthemarelimitedtosameweightforallattributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hajiagha, Mahdiraji,Hashemi,andTurskis(2015),investigatedtheproblemofweightdeterminationamong decisionmakersbyextendinganalgorithmtakenfromtheTOPSIStechniques.YangandDu(2015) determinedtheweightsofDMsinthegroupdecisionenvironmentviaanglecosineandprojection method. Yang,Du,Wang,andLiang(2017)presentedanovelapproachfordeterminingtheweights ofdecisionmakersbasedonroughgroupdecisioninMAGDMproblems.Yue(2017)determined theweightsofDMsbyusinganentropymeasure.Azadfallah(2018a)extendedVIKORandTOPSIS methodforsolvingMAGDMproblemsundercrispandintervaldata.Inaddition,threenewentropybased approachesareintroducedtodetermine theimportanceofDMsin groupdecision-making process.Inaddition, Azadfallah(2018b)proposedtwonewsystematicapproachtoevaluaterelative weightsofDMsinthegroupdecisionenvironmentbyextendingtwoalgorithmtakenfromthecrisp (the correlation-based approach), and interval (the ideal-based approach) TOPSIS techniques, to reducingtheriskofwrongchoice(ordecisionrisk)ingroupdecisionmakingprocess.However, mostofthemarelimitedtosameweightforallattributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%