2001
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.11.5151-5158.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus 89.6P Viremia in Rhesus Monkeys by Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
108
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak responses with recombinant pox-virus vectors have been lower, but can increase dramatically after one or two subunit protein boosts [37][38][39][40][41][42], suggesting effective B-cell priming by the vectored immunogen. Similar secondary neutralizing antibody responses are observed post-AIDS virus infection in macaques that are previously immunized with recombinant Env-containing DNA and viral vectors [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Furthermore, a recent study in rabbits showed that priming with a recombinant vector followed by boosting with subunit Env protein can be superior to multiple inoculations with Env protein alone [50].…”
Section: Hiv-1 Immunogenssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Peak responses with recombinant pox-virus vectors have been lower, but can increase dramatically after one or two subunit protein boosts [37][38][39][40][41][42], suggesting effective B-cell priming by the vectored immunogen. Similar secondary neutralizing antibody responses are observed post-AIDS virus infection in macaques that are previously immunized with recombinant Env-containing DNA and viral vectors [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Furthermore, a recent study in rabbits showed that priming with a recombinant vector followed by boosting with subunit Env protein can be superior to multiple inoculations with Env protein alone [50].…”
Section: Hiv-1 Immunogenssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…A competition of the two Gag derived epitopes with the immunodominant V3 epitope was not observed. These results strongly support recent findings by others demonstrating the feasibility of multiepitope DNA vaccines to elicit broad CTL responses against multiple HI-viral epitopes [41,42]. This is of particular interest in the light of previous vaccination studies in non-human primates demonstrating that single viral epitope-specific CTL responses may not be sufficient to block infection with pathogenic SIV [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Neutralization titers were negative on the day of challenge and 4 wk after challenge, became detectable by wk 8, and increased with time in some of the animals. The similar timing of the development of this response in group 1, 2, and 3 vaccinated animals compared with group 4 and historic controls excludes priming of neutralizing Abs by the vaccination regimen (61)(62)(63)(64). After wk 45, titers of neutralizing Ab increased in only a few animals of groups 1, 3, and 4.…”
Section: Protection From Shiv Infection And/or Simian Aids After Mucomentioning
confidence: 92%