Reference dependence, loss aversion and residential property development decisions

Abstract

We analyse land transaction and residential development data from Beijing, China and identify that developers’ evaluation of land transaction exhibits reference dependence and loss aversion. Developers with prior land transaction losses set higher house prices than those without prior losses. This effect is strongest at the beginning and towards the end of the property sales period. It is moderated by developers’ ownership structure and listing status. Privately-owned firms experience stronger effects than their state-owned counterparts, whereas unlisted firms are more strongly affected than their listed counterparts. Results have implications on the relationship between the land and the housing markets in China. In a booming land market where land acquisition entails a high price, developers will transfer excess land price to house prices, thereby increasing the latter. The land market plays an integral role in managing housing prices in China.

Cognitive bias, intuitive attributes and investment decision quality in commercial real estate in Uganda

“…In an investment decision context, loss aversion is the frequent evaluation undertaken to shift investors' long-term investment decision mix. When evaluating investment decision quality, the investor is more sensitive to losses than gains (Bao et al , 2021; Merkle, 2020; Ainia and Lutfi, 2019). This assertion agrees with Ramalakshmi et al (2019), who post that investor postpone the sales of stocks whose value is gone down and quicken the sales of stocks that increase in value.…”

Matching Behavioral Theories and Rules with Research Methods in Spatial Planning-Related Fields

“…Here, we understand “behavior” as the way in which a “person behaves in response to a particular situation or stimulus” or “a machine or natural phenomenon works or functions” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2018), encompassing the action (or inaction) taken by individuals, collective action, and system performance from the perspective of complex adaptive systems (Batty 2005; De Roo and Silva 2010; Donaghy 2021). Also, we understand “theories” as “bodies of knowledge that … aim to explain robust phenomena” and “models” as “instantiations of theories” that illustrate “the mechanisms that might govern the processes into relevant parts, properties of these parts, relations between parts, and temporal dynamics of their change” (Fried 2020, p. 336; Smaldino 2020).…”

“…The interest in the "behavioral" approach in the context of behavioral sciences has increased in recent years in many disciplines. Following this trend, the psychological and sociological aspects of decision-making, for example, the concepts of habitual behavior, loss aversion, cognitive biases, heuristics, and social norms are being highlighted when developing appropriate methods for studying behavior in various domains including the spatial planning-related fields (Asgari and Jin 2020; Bandsma, Rauws and de Roo 2021;Bao, Meng and Wu 2021). Behavioral theories, or theories of behavior, can be especially beneficial in spatial planning-related fields in the landscape of the rising popularity of data-driven research, big data analytics, and space and time-sensitive modeling approaches.…”