2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference standards for body fat measures using GE dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in Caucasian adults

Abstract: BackgroundDual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an established technique for the measurement of body composition. Reference values for these variables, particularly those related to fat mass, are necessary for interpretation and accurate classification of those at risk for obesity-related health complications and in need of lifestyle modifications (diet, physical activity, etc.). Currently, there are no reference values available for GE-Healthcare DXA systems and it is known that whole-body and regional fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, an AG ratio <1.0 presented with small variation in VAT, but with a strong, correlational increase in VAT when >1.0. This might imply that the mean AG ratios observed in our sample were within a healthy range, even when being above a previously suggested normative level (Imboden et al, ). Moreover, among the participants with BN and BED, 15% and 42%, respectively, had an AG ratio >1, and all but two of these had VAT levels above normative levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our sample, an AG ratio <1.0 presented with small variation in VAT, but with a strong, correlational increase in VAT when >1.0. This might imply that the mean AG ratios observed in our sample were within a healthy range, even when being above a previously suggested normative level (Imboden et al, ). Moreover, among the participants with BN and BED, 15% and 42%, respectively, had an AG ratio >1, and all but two of these had VAT levels above normative levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…All data were analyzed according to the guidelines (Nana, Slater, Stewart, & Burke, 2015). Recommended %BF for premenopausal females was set at <33%, based on an evaluation of previous studies (Imboden et al, 2017a;Okorodudu et al, 2010). By combining BMI and %BF information, we defined a woman as having "masked obesity" if BMI < 25 and %BF 33%.…”
Section: Physical Activity Crf and Muscle Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage android fat for all subjects was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. [18][19][20][21] Total android fat (total body fat) was calculated as the product of body weight and percentage android fat.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From VF measurements, we calculated the ratios VF/TBF, VF/weight, VF/LM, and VF/Android fat. Body composition parameters were analyzed using age‐, gender‐, race‐, and instrument‐specific reference values for VF, TBF, and LMI …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%