1999
DOI: 10.1130/gsat-1999-10-01-science
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining Rodinia: Geologic Evidence for the Australia–Western U.S. connection in the Proterozoic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that both the northern and southern margins of the NCB suffered from the Grenvillian orogenic event. Our early Palaeozoic reconstruction of the NCB and Gondwana also favours an alternative Rodinia model, namely the Australia-Western US Connection (Karlstrom et al 1999;Burrett & Berry 2000), in which the northern Qinling fold belt (Kuanping complex) of the NCB was the western continuation of the Grenvillian belt in the eastern margin of Laurentia (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These results suggest that both the northern and southern margins of the NCB suffered from the Grenvillian orogenic event. Our early Palaeozoic reconstruction of the NCB and Gondwana also favours an alternative Rodinia model, namely the Australia-Western US Connection (Karlstrom et al 1999;Burrett & Berry 2000), in which the northern Qinling fold belt (Kuanping complex) of the NCB was the western continuation of the Grenvillian belt in the eastern margin of Laurentia (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…A complex set of palaeomagnetic data places important constraints on the viability of the SWEAT model, restricting its window of feasibility to the late Palaeoproterozoic (Li et al, 2008), or to a narrow c. 1.0-0.8 Ga time interval (Evans, 2009). In contrast, the AUSWUS (Karlstrom et al, 1999(Karlstrom et al, , 2001Burrett and Berry, 2000) models place the proposed conjugate Australia-Antarctica landmass adjacent to the south-western USA, far south of the area considered in this article. The Siberian model (Sears and Price, 2000) calls for a prolonged c. 2.0-0.52 Ga joint Siberia-Laurentia continent that further requires a connection to a northern Australian, 1.61-1.51 Ga zircon source for the Mesoproterozoic Belt-Purcell Supergroup.…”
Section: The Significance Of Late Mesoproterozoic Events In Western Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectonic assembly of the supercontinent Rodinia during the late Mesoproterozoic (Dalziel, 1991;Hoffman, 1991;Moores, 1991) is a widely accepted hypothesis, although details of the continental configuration, timing and processes involved in amalgamation remain controversial (e.g. Karlstrom et al, 1999;Sears and Price, 2000;Li et al, 2008;Evans, 2009). In North America, intense, c. 1.3-1.0 Ga contractional deformation and magmatism along the eastern and southern margins of Laurentia (Hoffman, 1989;Davidson, 2008;Mosher et al, 2008), culminating in the c. 1.09-0.98 Ga Grenvillian Orogeny (Hynes and Rivers, 2010), is regarded as the flagship of Rodinian activity worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). As a consequence, these rocks form a critical region for testing the proposed Proterozoic link between Australia and Laurentia (Dalziel, 1991;Moores, 1991;Brookfield, 1993;Karlstrom et al, 1999Karlstrom et al, , 2001Burrett & Berry, 2000). This hypothesized correlation forms the basis for one of the more influential, albeit still debated, continental reconstructions for the Neoproterozoic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%