2007
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection and transmission for conformal defects

Abstract: We consider conformal defects joining two conformal field theories along a line. We define two new quantities associated to such defects in terms of expectation values of the stress tensors and we propose them as measures of the reflectivity and transmissivity of the defect. Their properties are investigated and they are computed in a number of examples. We obtain a complete answer for all defects in the Ising model and between certain pairs of minimal models. In the case of two conformal field theories with a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
218
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has also been a great deal of study of defects between different conformal field theories, with exact classifications in a few cases [2], exact proposals [9] for defects related to renormalisation group flows, and perturbative calculations [10].…”
Section: Jhep06(2018)143mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There has also been a great deal of study of defects between different conformal field theories, with exact classifications in a few cases [2], exact proposals [9] for defects related to renormalisation group flows, and perturbative calculations [10].…”
Section: Jhep06(2018)143mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One characteristic of a conformal defect is its transmission coefficient T , or equivalently its reflection coefficient R = 1 − T , which was defined in [2]. These take the values R = 0 for a topological defect and R = 1 for a factorised defect, and 0 < R < 1 for a general conformal defect in a unitary theory [11].…”
Section: Jhep06(2018)143mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations