2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-008-0169-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts associated with thrombocytosis: comparative analysis of marked with non-marked thrombocytosis, and relationship with JAK2 V617F mutational status

Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues (2001) defined a provisional entity named refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts associated to marked thrombocytosis (RARS-MT). Diagnosis of RARS-MT requires more than 15% of ringed sideroblasts in bone marrow aspirate and the existence of a thrombocytosis in blood, with a platelet count above 600 x 10(9)/L. Nevertheless, controversy exists regarding this platelet count "cut-off" value and, when RARS-MT was d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raya et al have already answered this question in a previous study in which they show that there was no difference in survival between the two groups. 15 Our study confirmed this finding in a large series since no difference was noted in the outcome according to the platelet threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Raya et al have already answered this question in a previous study in which they show that there was no difference in survival between the two groups. 15 Our study confirmed this finding in a large series since no difference was noted in the outcome according to the platelet threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…15,18 Our results clearly show that no difference was observed in the survival rate between JAK2V617F positive and negative RARS-T patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…52 These findings have prompted some authorities to suggest that RARS-T should be moved to the MPN category, whereas others argued that RARS-T is not a distinct entity at all, but rather an MPN that has undergone genetic For personal use only. on May 9, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From evolution to acquire ring sideroblasts.…”
Section: Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%