1996
DOI: 10.5085/0898-5510-9.3.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regarding The New Worklife Expectancy Tables

Abstract: No abstract available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers (Rodgers, AREA Meeting, 2001) have questioned The New Tables as a "black box" because the "continuum of disability" (Gluck, 1996 and Gibson under "Adjustment to Specific Case") weightings are mysterious. Computer output from VEI's Worklife Probability computer program prints out the "continuum" assumption used for each particular case, which, if assumed to be 100%, will print instead the classification used (e.g., ND, NSD, or SD).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers (Rodgers, AREA Meeting, 2001) have questioned The New Tables as a "black box" because the "continuum of disability" (Gluck, 1996 and Gibson under "Adjustment to Specific Case") weightings are mysterious. Computer output from VEI's Worklife Probability computer program prints out the "continuum" assumption used for each particular case, which, if assumed to be 100%, will print instead the classification used (e.g., ND, NSD, or SD).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%