2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of compensatory growth by molecular mechanism in Labeo rohita juveniles under different feeding regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this compensatory phenomenon has been previously described for other molecular mechanisms. 31,32 The presence of PF-573228 did not affect the Focal adhesion complexes are key structures participating in the interactions between cells and surfaces of biomaterials and may affect cell morphology, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. 35 Vinculin detection has been conducted to identify these complexes, but distinct data have been described [36][37][38] .…”
Section: Effect Of Fak Inhibition On the Gene Expression Of Integrin mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, this compensatory phenomenon has been previously described for other molecular mechanisms. 31,32 The presence of PF-573228 did not affect the Focal adhesion complexes are key structures participating in the interactions between cells and surfaces of biomaterials and may affect cell morphology, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. 35 Vinculin detection has been conducted to identify these complexes, but distinct data have been described [36][37][38] .…”
Section: Effect Of Fak Inhibition On the Gene Expression Of Integrin mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Metabolic and/or productive responses under different feeding regimes and involving fasting and refeeding periods have been studied for several species of fish, such as Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) (Dar et al 2018), Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Palma et al 2010), Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) (Nikki et al 2004) as well as native Brazilian species such as Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887) (Ortiz et al 2008), C. macropomum (Ituassú et al 2004;Santos et al 2010;Assis et al 2020) and Brycon amazonicus (Spix and Agassiz, 1829) (Urbinati et al 2014). For P. brachypomus juveniles, there are three published studies using short (Favero et al 2022) and/or alternating (Rodríguez and Landines 2011; Rodríguez and Landines-Parra 2018) fasting and refeeding protocols, aiming at compensatory growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many species of fish can mobilize their metabolic and body reserves such as glycogen, lipids, and proteins during a certain period of the year and may go days or even months without feeding due to fluctuations in the demand for food in nature or during the reproduction and spawning seasons when these animals do not feed [1]. However, important factors such as the species and the animals' own physiological needs can influence this mobilization [2]. During refeeding, fish may exhibit hyperphagia, quickly restore their energy needs and body composition, and achieve compensatory growth, corresponding to an animal's ability to grow rapidly after having gone through a period of total or partial food restriction [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%