1999
DOI: 10.1250/ast.20.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between envelope pattern and sound quality of impulsive sounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of single heavy-weight floor impact sound was 0.5 s for all stimuli, which corresponds to the typical duration of all data measured in 26 floors. Duration of 0.5 s is enough to perceive psychoacoustical aspects of sound like loudness, timbre, and so on (Kuwano et al, 1999;Roberts et al, 2005), which is highly correlated with annoyance. A low-pass filter with cutoff frequency at 4 kHz was then applied to remove electrical noise components in the higher frequency range.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of single heavy-weight floor impact sound was 0.5 s for all stimuli, which corresponds to the typical duration of all data measured in 26 floors. Duration of 0.5 s is enough to perceive psychoacoustical aspects of sound like loudness, timbre, and so on (Kuwano et al, 1999;Roberts et al, 2005), which is highly correlated with annoyance. A low-pass filter with cutoff frequency at 4 kHz was then applied to remove electrical noise components in the higher frequency range.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the acknowledged importance of impact sound on players' perceptions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], only a few studies of the sound characteristics of sports equipment have actually been undertaken and all have been related to golf. Wicks et al [2] compared the dynamic properties of forged and cast clubheads but found little difference in the natural frequencies of the whole clubs or the acoustic response of the heads.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Golf Club Impact Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuwano et al [5] asked ten subjects to rate the sounds from numerous different drivers using seven-point adjective scales ranging from "hard-soft", "sharp-dull", "refreshing-not refreshing", "powerful-weak" and "vividdead". Strong correlations were obtained between the subjects' perceptions and the psychoacoustic metrics loudness and sharpness of the measured impact sounds.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Golf Club Impact Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations