Relations publiques

Appel, Violaine; Boulanger, Hélène; Lavigne, Alain

doi:10.4000/communication.7257

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Beyond Metatheory Few domains have seen as much movement in the development of design principles for proof engineering as mechanized metatheory. Opinions on the role that POPLMark played in this are mixed (Pierce, 2017;Appel, 2017). There is little disagreement that POPLMark was timely: Proof assistants were becoming more usable, and the ongoing development of CompCert (Section 3.1.1) inspired confidence in their usefulness.…”

Section: Proof Engineering For Other Domainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

QED at Large: A Survey of Engineering of Formally Verified Software

Ringer

Palmskog

Sergey

et al. 2019

FNT in Programming Languages

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development of formal proofs of correctness of programs can increase actual and perceived reliability and facilitate better understanding of program specifications and their underlying assumptions. Tools supporting such development have been available for over 40 years, but have only recently seen wide practical use. Projects based on construction of machine-checked formal proofs are now reaching an unprecedented scale, comparable to large software projects, which leads to new challenges in proof development and maintenance. Despite its increasing importance, the field of proof engineering is seldom considered in its own right; related theories, techniques, and tools span many fields and venues. This survey of the literature presents a holistic understanding of proof engineering for program correctness, covering impact in practice, foundations, proof automation, proof organization, and practical proof development.

show abstract

Section: Proof Engineering For Other Domainsmentioning

confidence: 99%