2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between HPLC precision and number of significant figures when reporting impurities and when setting specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agut et al (Agut, Segalini et al 2006) examined different rules and their application to the reporting interval of results and specifications. The best known and simplest rule to implement is that stated in the AMST standard E-29-02.…”
Section: Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agut et al (Agut, Segalini et al 2006) examined different rules and their application to the reporting interval of results and specifications. The best known and simplest rule to implement is that stated in the AMST standard E-29-02.…”
Section: Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%