2016
DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000000381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between left coronary artery bifurcation angle and restenosis after stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using coronary CTA, the mean LM-LAD arteries angle measured by Kawasaki et al was 37±13° [ 24 ], and that by Cui et al was 34.2±13.4° [ 6 ]. In a previous analysis of coronary angiographies, we measured an average LM-LAD arteries angle of 34.1°±18.5° [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using coronary CTA, the mean LM-LAD arteries angle measured by Kawasaki et al was 37±13° [ 24 ], and that by Cui et al was 34.2±13.4° [ 6 ]. In a previous analysis of coronary angiographies, we measured an average LM-LAD arteries angle of 34.1°±18.5° [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of significant and non-significant stenosis of the LAD and LCX should be a more critical issue than the arterial diameter. Second, the LCBA values on angiograms were not measured for comparison; however, since CCA had been shown to have limitations (such as foreshortening and out-of-plane magnification), coronary CTA has been demonstrated to be an accurate tool to measure the LCBA 14 , 17 . Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography may help to resolve this problem, but the availability is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harrison and Marshall found no significant difference between the bifurcation angles of normal patients vs. those with stenosis, 20 but the important role of branch angle has been suggested in several studies. [45][46][47] Moreover, as shown in Table 3, there was a significant difference in the ECA/CCA diameter ratio (5.64±12.751% vs. −3.59±8.697%, P=0.047) between crotches. Regions with low TAWSS and high OSI appeared on the sinus, which was consistent with the location of neointima.…”
Section: Synthetic Models: Univariate and Multivariate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 80%