2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00377-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between microfilaria count and sensitivity of the direct smear for diagnosis of canine dirofilariosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because 8 of their samples showed no microfilariae on counting slides, they were considered to have less than 300 Mf/ml of blood. Another dog’s Mf count was below 300 Mf/ml as well, and therefore, the number of low microfilaremic dogs was assumed to be 9 [17]. A total of 11 dogs were in the higher microfilariae count group, with a total microfilariae count ranging from 438 to 44,538 Mf/ml of blood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because 8 of their samples showed no microfilariae on counting slides, they were considered to have less than 300 Mf/ml of blood. Another dog’s Mf count was below 300 Mf/ml as well, and therefore, the number of low microfilaremic dogs was assumed to be 9 [17]. A total of 11 dogs were in the higher microfilariae count group, with a total microfilariae count ranging from 438 to 44,538 Mf/ml of blood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final microfilariae number was the mean of the four counting results. When no microfilaria could be located on the counting slides, and yet the sample showed microfilariae positive on Knott’s test, the microfilaremia was assumed to be less than 300 Mf/ml [17]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to perform, rapid and inexpensive, it conserves mf morphology and size, and it enhances the sensitivity of mf detection in blood samples. Courtney and Zeng [20] showed that only in 80.9% of the samples in which D. immitis mf had been detected by the Knott’s test, the parasites could also be found in direct smears and that the sensitivity of the direct smear was especially low in samples with less than 10 mf per ml. This is of particular relevance for A. dracunculoides and A. reconditum mf, since the average number of mf/ml is usually low in these species [10,11,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only limited information has been available on the blood volume required in DBS, and most importantly, the lowest mff concentration permitting a quick detection with the DBS and QBC tube methods. The sensitivity of DBS has been reported at a high level only when mff counts exceeded 1000 ml 21 (Rawlings, 1986), but in a recent study a 100% sensitivity was documented for mff counts higher than 50 ml 21 (Courtney & Zeng, 2001). In DBS the differentiation between D. immitis and Dipetalonema reconditum mff can be assessed by their number and motility pattern, though this method is considered of low diagnostic yield, especially for those areas where D. immitis frequently coexists with other non-pathogenic filarial species (Papazahariadou et al, 1994;Dillon, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%