1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00590-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between nerve and muscle fiber conduction velocities of the same motor unit in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VRF with Doublet Stimulation. The estimated values for average muscle fiber CV from the CMAP accorded with previous reports, 21,22 although the CV of CMAP is the average of all activated fibers and might be biased by the contribution of fibers lying close to the surface recording electrode. For subjects showing subnormal CV the baseline value was reached at an ISI in the range of 4 -6 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…VRF with Doublet Stimulation. The estimated values for average muscle fiber CV from the CMAP accorded with previous reports, 21,22 although the CV of CMAP is the average of all activated fibers and might be biased by the contribution of fibers lying close to the surface recording electrode. For subjects showing subnormal CV the baseline value was reached at an ISI in the range of 4 -6 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The estimated values for average muscle fiber conduction velocity from the CMAP are in agreement with previous reports 6, 21, 22. Subjects with subnormal CV reached baseline CV at an ISI of 6 ms, which is in agreement with results reported in other studies 2, 6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Physiological applications of HD-sEMG (Arendt-Nielsen et al, 1992;Cescon et al, 2006;Christova et al, 1999;Falla and Farina, 2005;Farina et al, 2004bFarina et al, , 2005aGerilovsky et al, 1991;Hanayama, 1994;Holtermann et al, 2005b;Houtman et al, 2003;Kleine et al, 2000b;Maisetti et al, 2002;Masuda et al, 2001Masuda et al, , 1983aMasuda and Sadoyama, 1987;Masuda and DeLuca, 1991;Nishizono et al, 1989Nishizono et al, , 1990Okajima et al, 1998;Sadoyama et al, 1988;Saitou et al, 2000;Sbriccoli et al, 2003;Schulte et al, 2004aSchulte et al, , 2006aRoeleveld et al, 2000;Zwarts, 1989) Review: (Roeleveld and Stegeman, 2002;Rau et al, 2004) HD-sEMG applied to anal sphincter muscle: Review: Enck et al, 2004) HD-sEMG applied to facial muscles: (Castroflorio et al, 2005a;Castroflorio et al, 2005b;Geister et al, 1980;Iwasaki et al, 1990;Konno et al, 2005;Lapatki et al, 2006;Tokunaga et al, 1998;Tokunaga et al, 1991) Table 1 Overview of the search terms and strategy PubMed (surface emg AND (mfcv OR muscle fiber conduction velocity) AND patients) OR (surface emg AND clinical applications) OR (channel surface emg AND neuromuscular disorders) OR hsr-emg OR surface electrode-array EMG OR surface electrode-array electromyogram OR surface EMG multi-electrode) OR (multichannel AND ''surface electromyography'') OR multi-channel surface emg OR multi-ch...…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%