2011
DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30456-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between residual feed intake and end product palatability in longissimus steaks from steers sired by Angus bulls divergent for intramuscular fat expected progeny difference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
13
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study there were no differences between LRFI and HRFI steers in yield grade, ribeye area, subcutaneous adipose tissue mass as measured by backfat or intramuscular fat deposition as measured by marbling score. These results are consistent with several studies that did not find a significant correlation between RFI and these traits (Carstens et al, 2002;Schenkel et al, 2004;Baker et al, 2006;Nkrumah et al, 2007;Ahola et. al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study there were no differences between LRFI and HRFI steers in yield grade, ribeye area, subcutaneous adipose tissue mass as measured by backfat or intramuscular fat deposition as measured by marbling score. These results are consistent with several studies that did not find a significant correlation between RFI and these traits (Carstens et al, 2002;Schenkel et al, 2004;Baker et al, 2006;Nkrumah et al, 2007;Ahola et. al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While measures of tenderness or palatability were not recorded in the current study, the few studies that have addressed these parameters indicated that RFI has little impact on Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and sensory panel outcomes consistent with the lack of evidence for an association between RFI and meat quality that was observed in the current study (McDonagh et. al., 2001;Ahola et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean RFI of the most efficient and the least efficient group of animals was -1.10kg DM day -1 and +0.97kg DM day -1 , respectively, making a total difference of 2.07kg DM day -1 between the groups. This difference was larger than that found by Ahola et al (2011) in their evaluation of Angus steers, in which RFI values between efficiency groups ranged from -0.69 to +0.62kg DM day -1 , a difference of 1.31kg DM day -1 . The difference was also larger than the values found by Gomes et al (2012) in their comparison of groups of high-and low-efficiency Nellore steers, in which values ranged from -0.97 to +0.81kg DM day -1 , a variation of 1.78kg DM day -1 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Santana et al (2012) also found no significant differences in these indices, and noted the absence of any phenotypic correlation between this efficiency measure and such performance indices, as also observed by Basarab et al (2003) and Ahola et al (2011), indicating these variables are independent of each other. The results obtained corroborate the statements of Koch et al (1963), Arthur et al (2001) and Basarab et al (2003) that RFI is phenotypically independent of the traits of live weight and weight gain, and selects for lowintake animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A more diverse microbiota was previously correlated with feed inefficiency, resulting in significantly more complex metabolites produced by various functional pathways [43,44]. Previous studies also suggested an association between the marbling score and an inefficient microbiome [45][46][47]. However, other studies observed no differences in marbling scores across different feed efficiency groups of beef cattle [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%