2021
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Saliva and Sublingual Immunotherapy

Abstract: The demand for allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT), especially sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), is increasing because of its efficacy in inducing clinical remission of allergic diseases and its low risk of side effects. Since not all patients that undergo SLIT demonstrate an improvement in allergic symptoms, the development of biomarkers to predict the outcome and adjuvants for SLIT is desired. Saliva is the first target with which tablets used in SLIT come into contact, and salivary pH, chemical properties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 13 This therapy not only alleviates allergic symptoms but also has the potential to induce clinical remission in patients with IgE-mediated allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis, atopic asthma, and venom allergy. 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 This therapy not only alleviates allergic symptoms but also has the potential to induce clinical remission in patients with IgE-mediated allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis, atopic asthma, and venom allergy. 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, significantly higher IgG4 levels were also observed after the immunotherapy [ 5 ]. IgG4 and IgA in both serum and saliva are increased after AIT and may also correlate with the efficacy of AIT [ 7 ]. Der p -specific IgA antibodies are dominant in the serum and saliva of non-allergic children, while Der p -specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies predominate in allergic children, suggesting the specific IgA has a key role in the healthy immune response to mucosal allergens [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%