Relationship between Social Support, Impression Management and Well-being among Flood Victims in Malaysia

Mustaffa, Che Su; Marzuki, Najib Ahmad; Ariffin, Mohd Taib; Salleh, Nurul ‘Aaina Binti; Rahaman, Nur Haffiza

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.279

Cited by 17 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of this study complement the previous studies for the purpose of using of such instrument in Malaysia context. This study also contribute to the development of such instrument with the value added which is a single instrument with broader dimensions and more efficient administration of the instrument through technology Alshagga et al, 2015;Chan et al, 2016;Cohen and Williamson, 1988;Ezzati et al, 2013;Ho et al, 2007;Musa et al, 2007;Mustaffa et al, 2014;Lee, 2012;Nasir et al, 2012;Othman et al, 2016;Otto et al, 2006;O'Connor et al, 2010;Pallant and Tennant, 2007;Sauer et al, 2013;Sipon et al, 2014;2015;Shoeb et al, 2007;Whittle et al, 2012;Yusoff et al, 2014;Zigmond and Snaith, 1983).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…A very few of such instruments have gone through the process of adaptations (Musa et al, 2007). Most of the instruments also cover limited constructs in a single instrument and have been administered on paper and pencil basis, which are less efficient to be used in the context of flood victims especially during flood (Musa et al, 2007;Abdullah et al, 2015;Alshagga et al, 2015;Chan et al, 2016;Cohen and Williamson, 1988;Ezzati et al, 2013;Ho et al, 2007;Mustaffa et al, 2014;Lee, 2012;Nasir et al, 2012;Othman et al, 2016;Otto et al, 2006;O'Connor et al, 2010;Pallant and Tennant, 2007;Sauer et al, 2013;Sipon et al, 2014;2015;Shoeb et al, 2007;Whittle et al, 2012;Yusoff et al, 2014;Zigmond and Snaith, 1983). Therefore, e-PIFV-II has been set up to fill the gaps in measuring stress, anxiety, depression and trauma symptoms in a single instrument in the Malaysian context as well as to adopt Industrial Revolution 4.0 of the digital management.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of e-psychological instrument for flood victims version-II

al.¹

2019

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to validate a newly developed of e-Psychological Instrument for Flood Victims Version II (e-PIFV-II) by using expert judgment method. Measuring the psychopathology symptoms among flood victims is an important step for intervention and treatment. However, there is a gap of a valid, reliable and efficient instrument to measure flood victims' mental health in Malaysia. The e-PIFV-II is a digital self-report inventory that has 56 items with 4 dimension scales namely stress, anxiety, depression, and trauma. Results showed that there was strong content coefficient validity for each subscale of the instrument and the coefficient value for trauma subscale in the e-PIFV-II was increased. The coefficient value of stress was 0.8, anxiety was 0.9, depression was 1.0, trauma was 0.9 and overall was 0.9. This study supports the theoretical framework and provides practical implication in the field of clinical psychology and flood management.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of e-psychological instrument for flood victims version-II

al.¹

2019

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When the water, ascending beyond its standard level and enveloping the land encompassing it, flooding would make any society, regardless how developed, to become vulnerable . It has been assessed that at least 3.5 million people in Malaysia, live in flood plains and are exposed to varying likelihood of flood occurrence (Mustaffa et al, 2014). The rapid urbanization and expansion of land use development, changes in the hydrological cycle, poor storm water management system combined with overwhelming monsoon precipitation, abnormal rain storm's convection and other local features have generated series of flooding in Malaysia (Mohd et al, 2016).…”

Section: Generalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aerial Platform Reliability for Flood Monitoring Under Various Weather Conditions: A Review

Zakaria

Mahadi

Abdullah

et al. 2019

Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flood is an annual disaster in Malaysia, especially in the east coast region. Recently, other regions in Malaysia have also experience devastating flood. A flood aerial monitoring is one of the approaches that involved in the flood disaster management. Compared to space borne remote sensing, aerial platforms are much reliable to obtain higher spatial resolution and real time data. Due to cloud coverage and revisit limitations, space borne remote sensing approach is a less desirable option for flood monitoring. In this paper, a review of existing aerial platforms that perform remote sensing task under various weather conditions, specifically for flood monitoring is presented. There are four types of aerial platforms being reviewed, which are rotary wings, fixed wings, blimps and helikites. The main criteria of the review are the payload capacity, endurance (flight time), altitudes, tolerable wind speed, cost, vertical take-off and landing ability, and the ability to perform under various weather conditions, such as heavy precipitation and winds. From this review, the applications of aerial platform in recent studies never mentioned the capability of aerial platform used in such weather conditions. From all types of aerial platform discussed, helikite seems to be the most suitable to fly in extreme weather. The only drawback is that helikite has mobility issue since it is tethered to the ground. The application of helikite is useful for a small area coverage of flood monitoring. The authors will continue the study to evaluate the reliability of helikite in performing such task in the future.

show abstract

“…When the water, ascending beyond its standard level and enveloping the land encompassing it, flooding would make any society, regardless how developed, to become vulnerable (Hamin et al, 2013). It has been assessed that at least 3.5 million people in Malaysia, live in flood plains and are exposed to varying likelihood of flood occurrence (Mustaffa et al, 2014). The rapid urbanization and expansion of land use development, changes in the hydrological cycle, poor storm water management system combined with overwhelming monsoon precipitation, abnormal rain storm's convection and other local features have generated series of flooding in Malaysia (Mohd et al, 2016).…”

Section: Generalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aerial Platform Reliability for Flood Monitoring Under Various Weather Conditions: A Review

Zakaria

Mahadi

Abdullah

et al. 2018

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Flood is an annual disaster in Malaysia, especially in the east coast region. Recently, other regions in Malaysia have also experience devastating flood. A flood aerial monitoring is one of the approaches that involved in the flood disaster management. Compared to space borne remote sensing, aerial platforms are much reliable to obtain higher spatial resolution and real time data. Due to cloud coverage and revisit limitations, space borne remote sensing approach is a less desirable option for flood monitoring. In this paper, a review of existing aerial platforms that perform remote sensing task under various weather conditions, specifically for flood monitoring is presented. There are four types of aerial platforms being reviewed, which are rotary wings, fixed wings, blimps and helikites. The main criteria of the review are the payload capacity, endurance (flight time), altitudes, tolerable wind speed, cost, vertical take-off and landing ability, and the ability to perform under various weather conditions, such as heavy precipitation and winds. From this review, the applications of aerial platform in recent studies never mentioned the capability of aerial platform used in such weather conditions. From all types of aerial platform discussed, helikite seems to be the most suitable to fly in extreme weather. The only drawback is that helikite has mobility issue since it is tethered to the ground. The application of helikite is useful for a small area coverage of flood monitoring. The authors will continue the study to evaluate the reliability of helikite in performing such task in the future.</p>

show abstract

Relationship between Social Support, Impression Management and Well-being among Flood Victims in Malaysia

Cited by 17 publications

References 21 publications

Validation of e-psychological instrument for flood victims version-II

Validation of e-psychological instrument for flood victims version-II

Aerial Platform Reliability for Flood Monitoring Under Various Weather Conditions: A Review

Aerial Platform Reliability for Flood Monitoring Under Various Weather Conditions: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About