1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary central incisor and interpupillary distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
66
2
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
10
66
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Berry (1905), House and Loop (1939) found the width of the maxillary central incisor as 1/16 of the facial width, measured between the zigomatic bone. Cesario and Latta (1984) and Latta et.al. (1991) published that the mid-pupillary distance was supposed to be the width of the maxillary central incisor multiplied by the factor of 6.6.…”
Section: Frontal Viewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Berry (1905), House and Loop (1939) found the width of the maxillary central incisor as 1/16 of the facial width, measured between the zigomatic bone. Cesario and Latta (1984) and Latta et.al. (1991) published that the mid-pupillary distance was supposed to be the width of the maxillary central incisor multiplied by the factor of 6.6.…”
Section: Frontal Viewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As far back as 1914, Williams observed a possible relationship between the shapes of the face and tooth, 12 and although some authors have confirmed the existence of some relationship between certain anatomic details of the face and the tooth, 13,21 this evidence has remained weak for strictly correlating the shape of a maxillary central incisor to a point of reference of the face. 10 In the present study, it was observed that the association between the shapes of the face and maxillary central incisor was shown to be significant (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion between the dental and facial distances was obtained by a variation of the methods of Cesário and Latta, 13 Lavelle, 20 La Vere et al 21 , which found mean intervals ranging from 1/18 to 1/16. In this study, an interval of variation for the mesio-distal width was considered, based on the studies of Mavroskoufis and Ritchie, 15 who observed a variation in 63% of the maxillary central incisors of individuals, and this variation in width could be up to 1 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations