2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among Risk Management, Partnering, and Contractor Capability in International EPC Project Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
35
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Osipova (2015) observed that risks are inherent in all construction projects, which may negatively affect project delivery in terms of time, cost, and quality. If risks are not properly managed, the project stakeholders may seriously suffer from cost overruns, delays, or even project failures (Wang et al, 2016). Arising from this, the construction industry globally has been reported to have a poor reputation in risk management (RM) (Renuka et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osipova (2015) observed that risks are inherent in all construction projects, which may negatively affect project delivery in terms of time, cost, and quality. If risks are not properly managed, the project stakeholders may seriously suffer from cost overruns, delays, or even project failures (Wang et al, 2016). Arising from this, the construction industry globally has been reported to have a poor reputation in risk management (RM) (Renuka et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2000c);Cheng et al (2001);Naoum (2003);Cheng and Li (2004);Lu and Yan (2007b);Bresnen (2007); Bygballe et al (2010); Eriksson (2010); Hartmann and Bresnen (2011); Gottlieb and Jensen (2012); Eriksson (2015); Du et al (2016); Børve et al (2017); Anthony et al (2017); Conley and Gregory (1999); Eriksson and Pesämaa (2013) and Gray (1994); Peña-Mora and Harpoth (2001); Humphreys et al (2003); Manley et al (2007); Eriksson and Nilsson (2008); Bayliss et al (2004); Beach et al (2005) . (2001); Ng et al (2002); Packham et al (2003); Chan et al (2003a, 2003b); Wood and Ellis (2005); Lu and Yan (2007a); Alderman and Ivory (2007); Crespin-Mazet and Portier (2010); Chan et al (2013); Mollaoglu et al (2015); Black et al (2000); W. T. Chen and T.-T. Chen (2007); Chan et al(2008) (2000);Bresnen and Marshall (2000a, 2000b;Swan and Khalfan (2007);Kadefors et al (2007);Mason (2007);Laan et al (2011a);Du et al (2016);Cheng (2016);Wang et al (2016);Lazar (2000);Cheung et al (2003);Cacamis and Asmar (2014) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the integration of design and construction, the introduction of the EPC model can not only reduce the risk of project uncertainty but also provide a platform for the EPC general contractor to optimize the project [11]. With the continuous development of construction management reform in China's hydropower industry and the extensive application of EPC in the Architecture, Engineering & Construction (AEC) industry worldwide [12,13], both theoretical and practical experts have agreed that it is imperative to further develop the EPC project delivery system in order to improve the level of management and productivity of the hydropower industry in China. Since 2009, several pilot projects have been implemented to take the lead in using EPC in Guangdong Province, China [14].…”
Section: Project Delivery Methods and Epcmentioning
confidence: 99%