2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between soil and foliar nutrients in young densely planted mini-plots of Pinus radiata and Cupressus lusitanica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of soil concentrations indicated that exchangeable K and exchangeable Ca were significantly lower under C. lusitanica than P. radiata, indicating greater uptake by C. lusitanica. These results are consistent with the substantially greater foliar cation concentrations found in C. lusitanica than in P. radiata in this study (Davis et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Examination of soil concentrations indicated that exchangeable K and exchangeable Ca were significantly lower under C. lusitanica than P. radiata, indicating greater uptake by C. lusitanica. These results are consistent with the substantially greater foliar cation concentrations found in C. lusitanica than in P. radiata in this study (Davis et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This probably partly reflects the good inherent fertility of many of New Zealand's soils. Nonetheless, nutrient deficiencies have been identified for many stands (Weston, 1956;Smith et al, 2000;Davis et al 2007). Limitations are generally identified through regular foliar nutrient analyses (Payn et al, 2000) and managed through supplemental fertiliser addition where samples indicate marginal nutrient levels (Will, 1985).…”
Section: Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutritional interpretation by vector analysis was supplemented with interpretations based on critical foliage levels for radiata pine and, to a lesser extent, on soil analyses (Will, 1966(Will, , 1985Blakemore et al, 1987;Boardman et al, 1997;Payn et al, 2000;Mead, 2005b;Davis et al, 2007;Smethurst et al, 2007).…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%