2008
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308315599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Wrist Rig to Measure Motor Control and Spasticity in Poststroke Hemiplegia

Abstract: The means of all tests differed between impaired and unimpaired participants except for range of movement into flexion, the FAI, and the FMI. Repeatability coefficients for each test are presented as benchmark values for use in future trials in which the wrist rig tests may be used to detect change. Test-retest reliability was excellent in the impaired group (ICC = 0.88-0.98) and poor to excellent in the unimpaired group (ICC = 0.06-0.89). The Bland-Altman ranges showed no bias between assessors, and that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An instrumented wrist rig specifically designed to detect changes in the upper limb was used for all data collection [21]. To measure angle and forces at the wrist joint, the wrist rig is fitted with a potentiometer and a pair of strain gauges, which are calibrated before they are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An instrumented wrist rig specifically designed to detect changes in the upper limb was used for all data collection [21]. To measure angle and forces at the wrist joint, the wrist rig is fitted with a potentiometer and a pair of strain gauges, which are calibrated before they are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental set-up (Permission obtained to reproduce[21]) showing a) how the participant's arm is supported by the wrist rig b) an overhead view of the wrist. of the muscle system, and then estimates the IRC by crossplotting the deconvolved signal against the input ramp signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the problems associated with the clinical measurement and subsequent quantification of spasticity devices have been constructed to objectively quantify reflex and non-reflex stiffness over the wrist/ fingers [9,10], knee [11] and ankle [12][13][14][15][16]. Although these devices have taken positive steps towards the quantification of the different elements of stiffness to be clinically routine they must fulfil a number of requirements without sacrificing the accuracy of the measurements.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing apparatus 1) Wrist Rig: A wrist rig was employed that has been specifically designed and validated to detect changes in upper limb function [42]. The participant's arm was supported by two Velcro straps wrapped around the top and bottom of the elbow, and by a foam splint supporting the forearm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Data Collection: In Phase 1 of the study the following tests were performed to fully evaluate the control approaches Tracking Test T1 comprised a step-tracking task [42], in which participants were instructed to flex or extend their wrist to track the position indicated by the LEDs which were illuminated in a pseudo-random pattern. Each LED was lit for 6 seconds and the test lasted for 40 seconds.…”
Section: ) Fes Devicementioning
confidence: 99%